Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35618778›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2022

Distinct spatiotemporal patterns of syntactic and semantic processing in human inferior frontal gyrus.

Yanming Zhu, Min Xu, Junfeng Lu, Jianhua Hu, Veronica P Y Kwok, Yulong Zhou, Di Yuan, Bin Wu, Jie Zhang, Jinsong Wu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yanming Zhu *Neurologic Surgery Department, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6862-8123
Min Xu *Center for Brain Disorders and Cognitive Sciences, School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9265-9096
Junfeng Lu *Neurologic Surgery Department, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6091-5742
Jianhua Hu *Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, China.
Veronica P Y KwokCenter for Language and Brain, Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience, Shenzhen, China.
Yulong ZhouCenter for Language and Brain, Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0504-485X
Di YuanCenter for Language and Brain, Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience, Shenzhen, China.
Bin WuNeurologic Surgery Department, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jie ZhangNeurologic Surgery Department, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jinsong WuNeurologic Surgery Department, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. wujinsong@huashan.org.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-7854-9798
Li Hai TanGuangdong-Hongkong-Macau Institute of CNS Regeneration and Ministry of Education CNS Regeneration Collaborative Joint Laboratory, Jinan University (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China. tanlh@sions.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6983-1767
Fudan University · CNShenzhen Institute of Neuroscience · CNJinan University · CNChinese Academy of Social Sciences · CNShenzhen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human languages are based on syntax, a set of rules which allow an infinite number of meaningful sentences to be constructed from a finite set of words. A theory associated with Chomsky and others holds that syntax is a mind-internal, universal structure independent of semantics. This theory, however, has been challenged by studies of the Chinese language showing that syntax is processed under the semantic umbrella, and is secondary and not independent. Here, using intracranial high-density electrocorticography, we find distinct spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus that are specifically associated with syntactic and semantic processing of Chinese sentences. These results suggest that syntactic processing may occur before semantic processing. Our findings are consistent with the view that the human brain implements syntactic structures in a manner that is independent of semantics.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSemanticsBrainBrain MappingHumansPrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID35618778
OpenAlexW4281625230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.