Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35618773›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2022

Microbiomes of microscopic marine invertebrates do not reveal signatures of phylosymbiosis.

V Boscaro, C C Holt, N W L Van Steenkiste, M Herranz, N A T Irwin, P Àlvarez-Campos, K Grzelak, O Holovachov, A Kerbl, V Mathur and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Microbiota Associated WithEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

V Boscaro *Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. vittorio.boscaro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-1231
C C Holt *Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4222-6086
N W L Van SteenkisteDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
M HerranzDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
N A T IrwinDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2904-8214
P Àlvarez-CamposDepartment of Biology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9472-2378
K GrzelakInstitute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sopot, Poland.
O HolovachovDepartment of Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4285-0754
A KerblCentre of Natural History, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
V MathurDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
N OkamotoDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
R S PierceyHakai Institute, Heriot Bay, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8563-7155
K WorsaaeDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0443-4298
B S LeanderDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0798-0470
P J KeelingDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. pkeeling@mail.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7644-0745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals and microorganisms often establish close ecological relationships. However, much of our knowledge about animal microbiomes comes from two deeply studied groups: vertebrates and arthropods. To understand interactions on a broader scale of diversity, we characterized the bacterial microbiomes of close to 1,000 microscopic marine invertebrates from 21 phyla, spanning most of the remaining tree of metazoans. Samples were collected from five temperate and tropical locations covering three marine habitats (sediment, water column and intertidal macroalgae) and bacterial microbiomes were characterized using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. Our data show that, despite their size, these animals harbour bacterial communities that differ from those in the surrounding environment. Distantly related but coexisting invertebrates tend to share many of the same bacteria, suggesting that guilds of microorganisms preferentially associated with animals, but not tied to any specific host lineage, are the main drivers of the ecological relationship. Host identity is a minor factor shaping these microbiomes, which do not show the same correlation with host phylogeny, or 'phylosymbiosis', observed in many large animals. Hence, the current debate on the varying strength of phylosymbiosis within selected lineages should be reframed to account for the possibility that such a pattern might be the exception rather than the rule.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaPhylogenyVertebrates

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.