Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35618417›Full record

ArticleGenome research2022

Multiple

Neel Prabh, Christian Rödelsperger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neel PrabhDepartment for Integrative Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-1007
Christian RödelspergerDepartment for Integrative Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7905-9675
Max Planck Institute for Biology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The birth of new genes is a major molecular innovation driving phenotypic diversity across all domains of life. Although repurposing of existing protein-coding material by duplication is considered the main process of new gene formation, recent studies have discovered thousands of transcriptionally active sequences as a rich source of new genes. However, differential loss rates have to be assumed to reconcile the high birth rates of these incipient de novo genes with the dominance of ancient gene families in individual genomes. Here, we test this rapid turnover hypothesis in the context of the nematode model organism

Indexed as

RhabditidaAnimalsBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGenomeHumansPhylogenySex Chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID35618417
PMCPMC9341508
OpenAlexW4282915949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.