Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35618408›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2022

Views about primary care health checks for autistic adults: UK survey findings.

David Mason, Helen Taylor, Barry Ingham, Tracy Finch, Colin Wilson, Clare Scarlett, Anna Urbanowicz, Christina Nicolaidis, Nicholas Lennox, Sebastian Moss and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Co-design of an NHS primary care health check for autistic adults.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

David MasonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Helen TaylorPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Barry InghamPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK barry.ingham@cntw.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7268-2288
Tracy FinchDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Colin WilsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Clare ScarlettNHS Newcastle Gateshead Clinical Commissioning Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Anna UrbanowiczQueensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability, MRI-UQ, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Christina NicolaidisSchool of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9394-5956
Nicholas LennoxQueensland Centre for Intellectual and Developmental Disability, MRI-UQ, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sebastian MossNHS Northumberland Clinical Commissioning Group, Morpeth, UK.
Carole BuckleyRoyal College of General Practitioners, London, UK.
Sally-Ann CooperInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Malcom OsborneThe Kayaks support group, South Shields, UK.
Deborah GarlandNational Autistic Society, London, UK.
Dora RaymakerRegional Research Institute for Human Services, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jeremy R ParrPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBCumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust · GBPortland State University · USThe University of Queensland · AUNippon Kayaku (Japan) · JPNorth Tyneside General Hospital · GBNorthumbria University · GBRoyal College of General Practitioners · GBThe National Autistic Society · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompared with the general population, autistic adults experience higher rates of physical and mental health conditions, premature morbidity and mortality, and barriers to health care. A health check for autistic people may improve their health outcomes.

aimTo establish the views of autistic people towards a primary care health check for autistic people. DESIGN &

settingCross-sectional questionnaire study in England and Wales.

methodA questionnaire was sent to autistic adults with physical health conditions in England and Wales. A total of 458 people (441 autistic adults and 17 proxy responders) completed the questionnaire.

resultsMost responders (73.4%,

conclusionAutistic people and relatives were supportive of a primary care health check for autistic people. Information gathered was used to support the design of a primary care health check for autistic adults.

Indexed as

autistic disorderclinical (general)general practicehealth promotion and preventioninequalitiesprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID35618408
PMCPMC9904800
OpenAlexW4282924569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.