Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35618315›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2022

Teledermatology to reduce face-to-face appointments in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a quality improvement project.

Keira Jones, Emer Lennon, Keighley McCathie, Angela Millar, Chris Isles, Angus McFadyen, Heather Shearer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Artificial intelligence and skin cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Enhancing Aotearoa, New Zealand's Free Healthline Service through Image Upload Technology.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keira JonesSchool of Medicine, University of Dundee, College of Medicine Dentistry and Nursing, Dundee, UK keira.jones@nhs.scot.ORCID 0000-0003-2565-3131
Emer LennonCairnsmore Medical Practice, Dumfries and Galloway, UK.
Keighley McCathieCairnsmore Medical Practice, Dumfries and Galloway, UK.
Angela MillarSchool of Medicine, University of Dundee, College of Medicine Dentistry and Nursing, Dundee, UK.
Chris IslesDepartment of Medicine, Dumfries and Galloway Acute Hospitals, Dumfries, UK.
Angus McFadyenStatistical Consultant, akm-stats, Glasgow, UK.
Heather ShearerSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teledermatology is an important subspecialty of telemedicine that continues to evolve with advances in telecommunication and mobile phone technology. A 19-week primary care quality improvement project collected baseline data and tested three change ideas, using the Model for Improvement method, with primary and secondary aims: to increase the weekly percentage of remote dermatological consultations with supporting images that were successfully concluded remotely to greater than 80% and to reduce the weekly percentage of dermatological face-to-face consultations to less than 50%. We hypothesised that by improving the quality of patient images and the confidence of reception staff in triaging skin complaints, there would be a decrease in the weekly number of face-to-face dermatological appointments, thereby decreasing the risk of COVID-19 transmission within the practice and community. Two change ideas focused on supporting patients to improve image quality by introducing '4 Key Instructions' and a patient information leaflet (PIL). The third focused on increasing reception staff confidence in triaging skin complaints by introducing a triage pathway guidance tool. A total of 253 dermatological consultations were analysed: 170 of these were telephone consultations with 308 supporting images. Process measures showed clear improvements in the quality of images provided by patients which likely contributed to an increase in completed remote consultation. Our primary outcome measure was achieved. Our secondary outcome measure suggested that in the absence of high-quality images, it might not be possible to reduce dermatological face-to-face consultations much below 50% in primary care. Process measures showed clear improvements in the quality of images provided by patients which likely contributed to the increase in remote consultation. The implications of these findings for the theory of change are discussed.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PracticeRemote ConsultationHumansPandemicsQuality ImprovementControl charts/Run chartsCOVID-19GENERAL PRACTICEHealthcare quality improvementPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID35618315
PMCPMC9136693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.