ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2022
Enhancing the well-being of front-line healthcare professionals in high pressure clinical environments: A mixed-methods evaluative research project.
Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Supporting emergency departments workers well-being: a systematic review of the literature on interventions.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of compassion fatigue and work-life balance on life satisfaction: A study of healthcare professionals in Türkiye.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Developing Compassionate Leadership in the UK in Healthcare Contexts: A Narrative Review of Leadership Programmes and Outcomes.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
- The relationship between perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment among nurses in selected South African public hospitals.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The chain mediating role of resilience and change fatigue between intolerance of uncertainty and job burnout in nurses.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Perspectives and Practices of Healthcare Leaders in Supporting Healthcare Worker Well-Being: A Reality Check.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- Digital ethical reflection in long-term care: Leaders' expectations.Nursing ethics · 2024Article
- Emergency department workforces' experiences and perceptions of well-being from an international perspective: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Care management and leadership according to nurses' perception in the hospital context of COVID-19.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2024Article
- Relationships among perceived social support, mindful self-care, and resilience among a sample of nurses in three provinces in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe last few years have witnessed a growing concern with the well-being of healthcare professionals internationally because of increasing recognition of its impact on patient outcomes and staff retention. The COVID-19 pandemic, which has placed additional and substantial pressure on frontline healthcare professionals, gives added urgency to the topic. While numerous, and successful, interventions have been developed to address compromised well-being among healthcare professionals, they have not always been able to support the needs of frontline staff, specifically those working in high-pressure environments.
objectiveThis paper presents findings of an evaluative research study of an intervention, named the Resilience and Well-being Training Programme, developed and implemented within an Acute Assessment Unit in a hospital in the UK. The 8 week-long programme followed a combined approach (both person-directed and work-directed), with mindfulness training as well as lectures and discussions to deepen participants' understanding of organisational life. The training, delivered from January to July 2018, involved a total of 72 healthcare professionals from a wide range of levels (UK bands 2-8), trained in three cohorts.
designThe research followed a pre-post design to explore participants' experiences of working on the Unit, the programme and its impact on themselves and their working life.
settingThe study was conducted in a large NHS district general hospital in South London, UK.
participantsParticipants included healthcare assistants and nurses who had completed their preceptorship, worked in the hospital's acute assessment unit, and had undertaken the resilience and well-being training programme.
methodsThe study employed mixed methods (online questionnaire, face-to-face focus groups/interviews) to collect data.
resultsFindings showed participants' positive experience with the programme, however it had limited positive impacts on aspects of compromised well-being at the personal level and a statistically significant enhancement of the quality of relationships and communication on the Unit, with medium effect size (Cohen's D). The programme had a positive impact on the culture of the Unit.
conclusionsResults highlight the demand for and value of programmes designed in ways that enable this group of professionals to take part, because these professionals are often not able to participate in such programmes. A strong commitment from the leadership to enable staff attendance in time-protected programmes is one approach that works well in the short-term. However, this may be challenging to accomplish and raises issues of sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.