ArticleZebrafish2022
A New Transgenic Line for Rapid and Complete Neutrophil Ablation.
Article in Zebrafish, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut and Glomerular Barriers Determine Nanoplastic Fate and Systemic Impact.ACS environmental Au · 2026Article
- Cell death analysis of inducible, titratable neurodegenerative disease models in zebrafish and human stem cell-derived retinal organoids.Disease models & mechanisms · 2026Article
- Real-time characterisation of microbe-induced inflammation using a novel zebrafish larval corneal injury and infection model.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Neutrophils facilitate the epicardial regenerative response after zebrafish heart injury.Developmental biology · 2024Article
- Infection-experienced HSPCs protect against infections by generating neutrophils with enhanced mitochondrial bactericidal activity.Science advances · 2023Article
- An inducible model of chronic hyperglycemia.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Zebrafish lines expressing nitroreductase (NTR) in specific cell compartments, which sensitizes those cells to metronidazole (MTZ)-mediated ablation, have proven extremely useful for studying tissue regeneration and investigating cell function. In contrast to many cells, neutrophils are comparatively resistant to the NTR/MTZ targeted ablation strategy. Recently, a rationally engineered variant of NTR (NTR 2.0) has been described that exhibits greatly improved MTZ-mediated ablation efficacy in zebrafish. We show that a transgenic line with neutrophil-restricted expression of NTR 2.0 demonstrates complete neutrophil ablation, with an MTZ dose 100-fold less than current treatment regimens, and with treatment durations as short as 5 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.