Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35617428›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Reduced physiological plasticity in a fish adapted to stable temperatures.

Rachael Morgan, Anna H Andreassen, Eirik R Åsheim, Mette H Finnøen, Gunnar Dresler, Tore Brembu, Adrian Loh, Joanna J Miest, Fredrik Jutfelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characterization of darter (Conservation physiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachael MorganDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9589-6388
Anna H AndreassenDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0208-1812
Eirik R ÅsheimDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8171-9732
Mette H FinnøenDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3540-6356
Gunnar DreslerDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2963-4854
Tore BrembuDepartment of Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5622-8037
Adrian LohSchool of Science, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, United Kingdom.
Joanna J MiestSchool of Science, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent ME4 4TB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2534-0530
Fredrik JutfeltDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9838-3991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasticity can allow organisms to maintain consistent performance across a wide range of environmental conditions. However, it remains largely unknown how costly plasticity is and whether a trade-off exists between plasticity and performance under optimal conditions. Biological rates generally increase with temperature, and to counter that effect, fish use physiological plasticity to adjust their biochemical and physiological functions. Zebrafish in the wild encounter large daily and seasonal temperature fluctuations, suggesting they should display high physiological plasticity. Conversely, laboratory zebrafish have been at optimal temperatures with low thermal fluctuations for over 150 generations. We treated this domestication as an evolution experiment and asked whether this has reduced the physiological plasticity of laboratory fish compared to their wild counterparts. We measured a diverse range of phenotypic traits, from gene expression through physiology to behavior, in wild and laboratory zebrafish acclimated to 15 temperatures from 10 °C to 38 °C. We show that adaptation to the laboratory environment has had major effects on all levels of biology. Laboratory fish show reduced plasticity and are thus less able to counter the direct effects of temperature on key traits like metabolic rates and thermal tolerance, and this difference is detectable down to gene expression level. Rapid selection for faster growth in stable laboratory environments appears to have carried with it a trade-off against physiological plasticity in captive zebrafish compared with their wild counterparts.

Indexed as

Body TemperatureThermotoleranceZebrafishAnimalsPhenotypeTemperaturedomesticationectothermplasticitytemperature

Identifiers

PMID35617428
PMCPMC9295802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.