ArticlePLoS biology2022
Automated assessment reveals that the extinction risk of reptiles is widely underestimated across space and phylogeny.
Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- The entanglement between the IUCN Red List and international biodiversity law.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Contrasting patterns of alpine biodiversity across mountains and taxa worldwide.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Regulatory Responses of Ectothermic Embryos to Predicted Heat Stresses Under Near-Future Climate Change.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Elevation Filters Lizard Species Occurrences and Assemblages in Chitwan Annapurna Landscape, Nepal.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Rethinking desert definitions: Bridging the gap between science, policy, and conservation.Ambio · 2026Article
- Evolutionary patterns in squamate mitogenomes: Are selective regimes associated with fossoriality and limblessness?Genetics and molecular biology · 2026Article
- Sampling bias and uneven data coverage shape observed biodiversity patterns in a megadiverse island archipelago hotspot.PloS one · 2026Article
- Global Diversity Patterns are Explained by Diversification Rates and Dispersal at Ancient, Not Shallow, Timescales.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- Effects of Future Climate Extreme Heat Events and Land Use Changes on Land Vertebrates.Global change biology · 2025Article
- Range Modeling and Surveillance ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Demography Meets Climate Change: Life History Challenges for a Neotropical Viviparous Lizard.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- The future-focused Proactive Conservation Index highlights unrecognized global priorities for vertebrate conservation.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Exploring gaps, biases, and research priorities in the evidence for reptile conservation actions.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Anthropocene Imperilment of Ancient Diversity and Evolutionary Potential in Terrestrial Vertebrates.Research square · 2025Article
- Global assessment of current extinction risks and future challenges for turtles and tortoises.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Integrating the thermal dependence of sex ratio into distribution models to predict suitable habitats for the invasive freshwater pond slider turtle,Marine life science & technology · 2025Article
- Article
- Speciation in the Peninsular Indian Flying Lizard (Draco dussumieri) Follows Climatic Transition and Not Physical Barriers.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Three-quarters of species' ranges have not been covered by protected areas in global borders.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Enhanced risk assessment framework integrating distribution dynamics, genetically inferred populations, and morphological traits ofZoological research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Red List of Threatened Species, published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), is a crucial tool for conservation decision-making. However, despite substantial effort, numerous species remain unassessed or have insufficient data available to be assigned a Red List extinction risk category. Moreover, the Red Listing process is subject to various sources of uncertainty and bias. The development of robust automated assessment methods could serve as an efficient and highly useful tool to accelerate the assessment process and offer provisional assessments. Here, we aimed to (1) present a machine learning-based automated extinction risk assessment method that can be used on less known species; (2) offer provisional assessments for all reptiles-the only major tetrapod group without a comprehensive Red List assessment; and (3) evaluate potential effects of human decision biases on the outcome of assessments. We use the method presented here to assess 4,369 reptile species that are currently unassessed or classified as Data Deficient by the IUCN. The models used in our predictions were 90% accurate in classifying species as threatened/nonthreatened, and 84% accurate in predicting specific extinction risk categories. Unassessed and Data Deficient reptiles were considerably more likely to be threatened than assessed species, adding to mounting evidence that these species warrant more conservation attention. The overall proportion of threatened species greatly increased when we included our provisional assessments. Assessor identities strongly affected prediction outcomes, suggesting that assessor effects need to be carefully considered in extinction risk assessments. Regions and taxa we identified as likely to be more threatened should be given increased attention in new assessments and conservation planning. Lastly, the method we present here can be easily implemented to help bridge the assessment gap for other less known taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.