Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35617326›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

The prevalence and concentration of Salmonella enterica in poultry litter in the southern United States.

Laurel L Dunn, Vijendra Sharma, Travis K Chapin, Loretta M Friedrich, Colleen C Larson, Camila Rodrigues, Michele Jay-Russell, Keith R Schneider, Michelle D Danyluk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Assessing transcriptomic responses ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Probiotic Potential and Metabolite Characterization of BioprotectiveAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurel L DunnDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0786-5253
Vijendra SharmaFood Science and Human Nutrition Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, United States of America.
Travis K ChapinFood Science and Human Nutrition Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, United States of America.
Loretta M FriedrichFood Science and Human Nutrition Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, United States of America.
Colleen C LarsonOkeechobee County Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Human Nutrition University of Florida, Okeechobee, FL, United States of America.
Camila RodriguesDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.
Michele Jay-RussellWestern Center for Food Safety, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Keith R SchneiderFood Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Michelle D DanylukFood Science and Human Nutrition Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL, United States of America.

Funding

WESTERN CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETYU19FD004995 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Edward Robert Atwill · 2013 to 2026
$25.1M
FDA HHS U19 FD004995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry litter is applied to crop production land in the southern United States as a waste management strategy as it is a nitrogen-rich fertilizer and plentiful throughout the region. While litter is a known reservoir for human enteric pathogens including Salmonella enterica, little is known regarding pathogen prevalence, concentration, and common serotypes within the material. Litter from thirteen farms across four southern states was examined for Salmonella. Samples (n = 490) from six of the thirteen (46.2%) farms tested positive. Thirty-three samples out of 490 (6.7%) were Salmonella positive. Salmonella was ca. 95% less likely to be collected from stacked litter piles than from the poultry house floor or pasture, and every day increase in litter age reduced the likelihood of recovering Salmonella by 5.1%. When present, concentrations of Salmonella in contaminated poultry litter were variable, ranging from <0.45 to >280,000 MPN/g. The most prevalent serotypes found were Kentucky (45.5%), Kiambu (18.2%), and Michigan (12.1%). Salmonella Kentucky also had the greatest distribution and was found on 4 of the 6 (66.7%) positive farms. Results from this survey demonstrated that Salmonella prevalence and concentration in poultry litter is highly variable, and good agricultural practices are critical to safely use poultry litter as a soil amendment on fresh produce fields.

Indexed as

PoultrySalmonella entericaAnimalsChickensHumansPrevalenceSerogroupSoilUnited StatesSoil

Identifiers

PMID35617326
PMCPMC9135211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.