Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35617305›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A feasibility study to test a novel approach to dietary weight loss with a focus on assisting informed decision making in food selection.

Mindy H Lee, Catherine C Applegate, Annabelle L Shaffer, Abrar Emamaddin, John W Erdman, Manabu T Nakamura

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06280339 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Coping Strategies to Reduce Food Cravings During Dietary Weight Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignRan2024 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsObesity, Food Cravings, Weight LossArmsTest two food cravings strategies during dietary weight loss, Dietary weight loss program +Food cravings strategies
NCT07518875 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Testing an Online Dietary Weight Loss Program for Arab Adults: A Comparative Study With Existing Hospital-Based Weight Loss Interventions in Saudi Arabia

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsma YahyaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled68ConditionsOverweight and ObesityArmsOnline Lifestyle and Dietary Program, Usual Dietary Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mindy H LeeDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8287-3590
Catherine C ApplegateDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States of America.
Annabelle L ShafferDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States of America.
Abrar EmamaddinDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States of America.
John W ErdmanDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States of America.
Manabu T NakamuraDivision of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States of America.

Funding

Tissue microenvironment (TIMe) training programT32EB019944 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BHARGAVA, ROHIT, GASKINS, REX · 2016 to 2025
$1.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB019944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a significant contributor to the development of chronic diseases, some of which can be prevented or reversed by weight loss. However, dietary weight loss programs have shortcomings in the success rate, magnitude, or sustainability of weight loss. The Individualized Diet Improvement Program's (iDip) objective was to test the feasibility of a novel approach that helps individuals self-select a sustainable diet for weight loss and maintenance instead of providing weight loss products or rigid diet instructions to follow. The iDip study consisted of 22 dietary improvement sessions over 12 months with six months of follow-up. Daily weights were collected, and a chart summarizing progress was provided weekly. Six 24-hour dietary records were collected, and dietary feedback was provided in the form of a protein-fiber plot, in which protein/energy and fiber/energy of foods were plotted two-dimensionally together with a target box specific to weight loss or maintenance. An exit survey was conducted at 12 months. Twelve (nine female, 46.3±3.1 years (mean±SE)) of the initial 14 participants (BMI>28 kg/m2) completed all sessions. Mean percent weight loss (n = 12) at six and 12 months was -4.9%±1.1 (p = 0.001) and -5.4%±1.7 (p = 0.007), respectively. Weight loss varied among individuals at 12 months; top and bottom halves (n = 6 each) achieved -9.7%±1.7 (p = 0.0008) and -1.0%±1.4 weight loss, respectively. The 24-hour records showed a significant increase in protein density from baseline to final (4.1g/100kcal±0.3 vs. 5.7g/100kcal±0.5; p = 0.008). Although mean fiber density showed no significant change from the first month (1.3g/100kcal±0.1), the top half had significantly higher fiber/energy intake than the bottom half group. The survey suggested that all participants valued the program and its self-guided diet approach. In conclusion, half of the participants successfully lost >5% and maintained the lost weight for 12 months without strict diet instructions, showing the feasibility of the informed decision-making approach.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesWeight LossBody Mass IndexDecision MakingDietDietary FiberDiet, ReducingEnergy IntakeFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansDietary Fiber

Identifiers

PMID35617305
PMCPMC9135285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.