Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35617155›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2022

Exploration vs Convergence Speed in Adaptive-Bias Enhanced Sampling.

Michele Invernizzi, Michele Parrinello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Efficient QM/MM Modeling of Enzymatic Reactions Combining PathCV with OPES.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Oseltamivir aziridines are potent influenza neuraminidase inhibitors and imaging agents.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Making PLUMED Fly: A Tutorial on Optimizing Performance.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The role of fluctuations in the nucleation process.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  19. The seeds of the future are in the present: A blind exploration of metastable states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michele InvernizziFreie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-6557
Michele ParrinelloItalian Institute of Technology, 16163 Genova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In adaptive-bias enhanced sampling methods, a bias potential is added to the system to drive transitions between metastable states. The bias potential is a function of a few collective variables and is gradually modified according to the underlying free energy surface. We show that when the collective variables are suboptimal, there is an exploration-convergence tradeoff, and one must choose between a quickly converging bias that will lead to fewer transitions or a slower to converge bias that can explore the phase space more efficiently but might require a much longer time to produce an accurate free energy estimate. The recently proposed on-the-fly probability enhanced sampling (OPES) method focuses on fast convergence, but there are cases where fast exploration is preferred instead. For this reason, we introduce a new variant of the OPES method that focuses on quickly escaping metastable states at the expense of convergence speed. We illustrate the benefits of this approach in prototypical systems and show that it outperforms the popular metadynamics method.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationBiasEntropyProbability

Identifiers

PMID35617155
PMCPMC9202311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.