Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35617014›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2022

German Mobile Apps for Patients With Psoriasis: Systematic Search and Evaluation.

Christian Lull, Jan Alwin von Ahnen, Georg Gross, Victor Olsavszky, Johannes Knitza, Jan Leipe, Astrid Schmieder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Current challenges for evaluating mobile health applications.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  15. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian Lull *Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4817-5198
Jan Alwin von Ahnen *Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3929-0573
Georg GrossDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9144-1247
Victor OlsavszkyDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6083-5534
Johannes Knitza *Department of Internal Medicine - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9695-0657
Jan Leipe *Fifth Department of Medicine (Nephrology/Endocrinology/Rheumatology), University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9684-9700
Astrid Schmieder *Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6421-9699
Heidelberg University · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. The visibility of erythematous plaques on the skin as well as the pain and itchiness caused by the skin lesions frequently leads to psychological distress in patients. Smartphone apps are widespread and easily accessible. Earlier studies have shown that apps can effectively complement current management strategies for patients with psoriasis. However, no analysis of such apps has been published to date.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to systematically identify and objectively assess the quality of current publicly available German apps for patients with psoriasis using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) and compile brief ready-to-use app descriptions.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search and assessment of German apps for patients with psoriasis available in the Google Play Store and Apple App Store. The identified apps were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 reviewers, who independently rated them using the German MARS (MARS-G). The MARS-G includes 15 items from 4 different sections (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information) to create an overall mean score for every app. Scores can range from 1 for the lowest-quality apps to 5 for the highest-quality apps. Apps were ranked according to their mean MARS-G rating, and the highest-ranked app was evaluated independently by 2 patients with psoriasis using the user version of the MARS-G (uMARS-G). Furthermore, app information, including origin, main function, and technical aspects, was compiled into a brief overview.

resultsIn total, we were able to identify 95 unique apps for psoriasis, of which 15 were available in both app stores. Of these apps, 5 were not specifically intended for patients with psoriasis, 1 was designed for clinical trials only, and 1 was no longer available at the time the evaluation process began. Consequently, the remaining 8 apps were included in the final evaluation. The mean MARS-G scores ranged from 3.51 to 4.18. The app with the highest mean MARS-G score was Psoriasis Helferin (4.18/5.00). When rated by patients, however, the app was rated lower in all subcategories, resulting in a mean uMARS-G score of 3.48. Most apps had a commercial background and a focus on symptom tracking. However, only a fraction of the apps assessed used validated instruments to measure the user's disease activity.

conclusionsApp quality was heterogeneous, and only a minority of the identified apps were available in both app stores. When evaluated by patients, app ratings were lower than when evaluated by health care professionals. This discrepancy highlights the importance of involving patients when developing and evaluating health-related apps as the factors that make an app appealing to users may differ between these 2 groups.

trial registrationDeutsches Register Klinischer Studien DRKS00020963; https://tinyurl.com/ye98an5b.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPsoriasisDelivery of Health CareHumansdermatologydisease managementeHealthhealth appmental healthmHealthmobile healthpsoriasisskinsmartphone applicationteledermatologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35617014
PMCPMC9185339
OpenAlexW4213254861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.