Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35616854›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Recombinant Protein Production in Plants: A Brief Overview of Strengths and Challenges.

Stefan Schillberg, Holger Spiegel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan SchillbergFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Aachen, Germany. stefan.schillberg@ime.fraunhofer.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1896-4575
Holger SpiegelFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Aachen, Germany.
Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first recombinant proteins were produced in microbes and animal cells cultivated in bioreactors. These systems have become the standard for industrial-scale recombinant protein manufacturing. Later, the production of recombinant proteins was demonstrated in whole plants, which differ morphologically from cell-based systems and require completely different cultivation conditions. Over time, additional plant-based production platforms were established, including hairy roots and cell suspension cultures, which are more similar to conventional cell-based systems in terms of morphology, procedures, and equipment requirements. In this brief overview of the field, we explain why plant-based systems are becoming increasingly attractive for the production of valuable proteins with scientific and commercial applications, but also highlight the challenges that these systems must overcome to achieve more widespread industrial utilization. We discuss various laboratory protocols and approaches for the production of recombinant proteins in plants, as well as strategies to optimize yields, and the regulatory and legal framework.

Indexed as

BioreactorsCell Culture TechniquesAnimalsPlants, Genetically ModifiedRecombinant ProteinsSuspensionsRecombinant ProteinsSuspensionsBiopharmaceuticalsDownstream processingMolecular farming productsOptimization strategiesPlant-based expression systemsPlant molecular farming

Identifiers

PMID35616854
OpenAlexW4285038249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.