Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35616772›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2023

Protective effect of phytogenic plus short and medium-chain fatty acids-based additives in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli challenged piglets.

Valentina Caprarulo, Lauretta Turin, Monika Hejna, Serena Reggi, Matteo Dell'Anno, Pietro Riccaboni, Paolo Trevisi, Diana Luise, Antonella Baldi, Luciana Rossi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evaluation of dietary supplementation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Impacts of F18Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina CapraruloDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Lauretta TurinDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Monika HejnaDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Serena ReggiDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Matteo Dell'AnnoDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Pietro RiccaboniDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo TrevisiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Diana LuiseDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Antonella BaldiDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Luciana RossiDepartment of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, University of Milan, 26900, Lodi, Italy. luciana.rossi@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1178-4683
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post Weaning Diarrhea (PWD) is the most important multifactorial gastroenteric disease of the weaning in pig livestock. Phytogenic (PHY) natural extracts are largely studied as alternatives to antibiotic treatments in combating the global concern of the antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the protective effect of innovative phytogenic premix with or without short and medium chain fatty acids (SCFA and MCFA) in O138 Escherichia coli challenged piglets. Twenty-seven weaned piglets were allotted into four groups fed different diets according to the following dietary treatments: CTRL (n = 13) group fed basal diet, PHY1 (n = 7) fed the basal diet supplemented with 0.2% of phytogenic premix, PHY2 (n = 7) fed the basal diet supplemented with 0.2% of phytogenic premix added with 2000 ppm of SCFA and MCFA. After 6 days of experimental diet feeding, animals were challenged (day 0) with 2 × 10

Indexed as

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsSwine DiseasesAnimal FeedAnimalsDiarrheaDietFatty AcidsSwineFatty AcidsAlternatives to antibioticsEscherichia coliFatty acidsFeed additivesPhytochemicalsPig

Identifiers

PMID35616772
PMCPMC9873745
OpenAlexW4281560230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.