Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35616764›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2023

Towards Preventative Psychiatry: Concurrent and Longitudinal Predictors of Postnatal Maternal-Infant Bonding.

Frances L Doyle, Sophie J Dickson, Valsamma Eapen, Paul J Frick, Eva R Kimonis, David J Hawes, Caroline Moul, Jenny L Richmond, Divya Mehta, Mark R Dadds

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06781307 (Department of Nurse-Midwifery and Women Health Graduate Institute of Nurse-Nurse-Midwifery), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06781307 nacompletednot on this map

Department of Nurse-Midwifery and Women Health Graduate Institute of Nurse-Nurse-Midwifery

TypeinterventionalSponsorJen-Ai Hospital Institutional Review BoardRan2023 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsAttachmentArmsskin to skin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Frances L DoyleSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia. f.doyle@westernsydney.edu.au.
Sophie J DicksonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Valsamma EapenSchool of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, 2052, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Paul J FrickDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, 70803, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Eva R KimonisSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, 2052, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
David J HawesSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Caroline MoulSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jenny L RichmondSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, 2052, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Divya MehtaCentre for Genomics and Personalised Health, Faculty of Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Kelvin Grove, 4059, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Mark R DaddsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AULouisiana State University · USQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal-infant bonding is important for children's positive development. Poor maternal-infant bonding is a risk factor for negative mother and infant outcomes. Although researchers have examined individual predictors of maternal-infant bonding, studies typically do not examine several concurrent and longitudinal predictors within the same model. This study aimed to evaluate the unique and combined predictive power of cross-sectional and longitudinal predictors of maternal-infant bonding. Participants were 372 pregnant women recruited from an Australian hospital. Data were collected from mothers at antenatal appointments (T0), following their child's birth (T1), and at a laboratory assessment when their child was 5-11-months-old (T2). Poorer bonding at T2 was predicted at T0 by younger maternal age, higher education, and higher antenatal depressive symptoms. Poorer bonding at T2 was predicted at T1 by younger maternal age, higher education, and higher postnatal depressive symptoms. Poorer bonding at T2 was predicted at T2 by younger maternal age, higher education, higher postnatal depression symptoms, higher concurrent perceived social support, and more difficult infant temperament, when controlling for child age at T2. To promote positive maternal-infant bonding, global and targeted interventions in the perinatal period may benefit from targeting maternal psychopathology, perceived lack of social support, and coping with difficult infant temperament.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumMother-Child RelationsAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMothersObject AttachmentPregnancyMaternal bondingPostnatalPostpartum Bonding QuestionnairePregnancyWomen’s mental health

Identifiers

PMID35616764
PMCPMC10582133
OpenAlexW4281560594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.