Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35616721›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2022

Biotechnology of banana (Musa spp.): multi-dimensional progress and prospect of in vitro-mediated system.

Tsama Subrahmanyeswari, Saikat Gantait

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tsama SubrahmanyeswariCrop Research Unit (Genetics and Plant Breeding), Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, 741252, India.
Saikat GantaitCrop Research Unit (Genetics and Plant Breeding), Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, 741252, India. saikatgantait@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5059-2428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Banana (Musa spp.), commonly known as 'Adam fig' and 'Fruit of wise man', is a commercial herbaceous tropical fruit, which governs its antiquity from ancient periods in the Indian and African subcontinent. All parts of the plant, i.e. stem, leaf, root, inflorescence, peel, fruit, and flower, have significant medicinal and nutritional values. Owing to its multitude of uses, it is known as 'Kalpavriksha' (plant of virtues). To combat multi-faceted issues related to traditional propagation, in vitro-based regeneration-cum-genetic improvement approaches become the trend of the hour. The present review illustrates various physico-chemical factors that are responsible for successful in vitro regeneration and acclimatization, protoplast culture, anther and microspore culture, cryopreservation and synthetic seed production, genetic transformation, mutagenesis, and nanotechnological and omics approaches. The key intent of this article is to present an insight on in vitro biotechnological research advances in the past decade, to identify the research gaps, unexplored areas, and major shortcomings associated with banana biotechnology and to highlight the potential approaches to mitigate them. Eventually, this review made salient conclusions and recommendations paving the way forward for the banana researchers to develop innovative ideas in order to enhance the propagation frequency and to ensure the genetic improvement of banana. KEY POINTS: • This review addresses biotechnological interventions in Banana (Musa spp.) for enhanced propagation and quality improvement. • Highlights factors influencing in vitro regeneration, conservation, and genetic transformation. • Provides novel ideas to harness the qualitative and quantitative genetic improvement.

Indexed as

MusaBiotechnologyFruitHumansProtoplastsSeedsClonal fidelityCryopreservationGenetic transformationMolecular markerOmicsProtoplast cultureSomatic embryogenesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.