A Novel Thunderbolt Z-Epicanthoplasty for Asians.

backgroundAlthough many epicanthoplasty techniques have been proposed, prominent hypertrophic scarring in the medial canthal region remains a problem. The aim of this study was to develop a novel design that has a less prominent scar with minimal tension.

methodsA total of 489 patients underwent thunderbolt Z-epicanthoplasty from July 2015 to April 2019, with or without blepharoplasty. A triangular myocutaneous flap was lifted from the upper part of the epicanthal fold. The surrounding area was dissected to remove the rigid connective tissue between the orbicularis muscle and the skin, which creates skin tension. A Z-shaped flap toward the inferomedial canthal portion was added to create space for the triangular flap to be transposed to change the straight incision into a curved zigzag incision (final scar in the shape of a "thunderbolt"), making the scar irregular and less conspicuous.

resultsPostoperatively, all patients were followed up for ≥ 12 months. Among the patients, epicanthus tarsalis (60.12%) and palpebralis (36.19%) were the commonest epicanthus types, followed by epicanthus supraciliaris (3.07%) and inversus (0.61%). The average preoperative intercanthal distance was 42.25 ± 1.66 mm. This distance decreased significantly to 37.14 ± 1.78 mm (average, 5.11 ± 0.21 mm; p = 0.036) at the 12-month postoperative follow-up. Mild cicatricial redness was observed in the medial canthal area in six patients (1.2%) during the early postoperative period. The redness diminished within 6 months postoperatively. All patients obtained natural and aesthetically pleasing results without prominent hypertrophic scarring or other complications in the medial canthal area.

conclusionThe thunderbolt Z-epicanthoplasty is safe and effective for treating medial epicanthal folds. It is potentially helpful in minimizing postoperative medial canthal scarring and can be applied to various types of epicanthal folds with long-lasting results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . Non-Surgical Aesthetic IV.