ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2022
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody prevalence in adult patients with short bowel syndrome-A German multicenter cross-sectional study.
Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody prevalence in adult patients with short bowel syndrome-A German multicenter cross-sectional study.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNot all patients suffer from a severe course of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, demanding a definition of groups at risk. Short bowel syndrome (SBS) has been assumed to be a risk factor, because of the complexity of disease, the need for interdisciplinary care, and frequent contact with caretakers. We aimed to establish data on the course of infection and prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in SBS patients in Germany.
methodsFrom January 2021 until January 2022 a total of 119 patients from three different tertiary care centers with SBS were included. All patients received an antibody test against the nucleocapsid (N) antigen and were asked to fill out a questionnaire, which included frequency of contact with medical personnel, risk behavior and worries.
resultsSixty-seven percent of SBS patients received parenteral nutrition with a median of 6 days per week. The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 7.6% (n = 9). Seven patients with positive antibodies had coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with a mild course. None of the patients were hospitalized or needed further treatment. There was no difference in willingness to take risks in SARS-CoV-2 antibody-positive and -negative patients (P = 0.61). Patients were predominantly worried about the economy (61%) and transmitting COVID-19 (52%), less frequent (26%) about receiving insufficient medical treatment.
conclusionThese are the first clinical results concerning SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and COVID-19 disease in patients with SBS. The seropositivity is comparable to national data, which we attribute to increased risk awareness and avoidance. Further studies are warranted to investigate effects of COVID-19 infection in SBS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.