ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2022
[Rapid screening of 84 pesticide residues in dendrobium by Sin-QuEChERS Nano purification column with gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Rapid screening of 125 pesticide residues in tea substitutes by multi-plug filtration cleanup method combined with gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2025Article
- [Determination of three dechloranes in environmental water by magnetic solid-phase extraction-gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry based on the covalent organic framework material].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2024Article
- [Determination of 35 prohibited pesticide residues inSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2024Article
- [High-throughput screening of multi-pesticide residues in animal-derived foods by QuEChERS-online gel permeation chromatography-gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A rapid screening method for 84 pesticide residues in dendrobium perfringens parent material with different polarities was developed using a Sin-QuEChERS Nano clean-up column combined with gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). The differences in extraction efficiency of the targets were compared with different extraction solvents (acetonitrile containing 1% acetic acid, acetone) and methods (immersion with or without water). The purification effect and extraction recoveries of Sin-QuEChERS Nano method and classical dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE), solid-phase extraction (SPE) and QuEChERS were systematically compared using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.