ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2022
A Simple Standard for Sharing Ontological Mappings (SSSOM).
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Use of Controlled Terminologies, Ontologies, and Vocabularies for Evidence Generation Across a Large International Observational Network: Challenges and Lessons Learned From a Mixed Method Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- AI semantics for biomedical data integration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Programmatic access to ICTV virus taxonomy through a public ontology API.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Expanding the PHES-ODM: A Comprehensive, Open-Source Data Model for the Future of Wastewater-Based Epidemiology.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Beyond Identifier Matching: An Empirical Characterization of Failure Modes in Biomedical Knowledge Graph Integration.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- VO: The Vaccine Ontology.Scientific data · 2026Article
- The Cell Ontology in the age of single-cell omics.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Mondo: integrating disease terminology across communities.Genetics · 2026Article
- A governance framework for medical code standardization to enhance multi-institutional data quality.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Semantic alignment of the German Human Genome-Phenome Archive metadata model in Europe's genomics field.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Article
- Mapping of EFO terms from the GWAS catalog data to multiple ontologies at the Rat Genome Database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Rosetta Statements: simplifying FAIR knowledge graph construction with a user-centred approach.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Bio-Ontology Research: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assembly and reasoning over semantic mappings at scale for biomedical data integration.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Chemical classification program synthesis using generative artificial intelligence.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Expanding and refining the Mammalian Phenotype Ontology to enhance disease model discovery.Disease models & mechanisms · 2025Article
- Integrating Knowledge: The Power of Ontologies in Psychiatric Research and Clinical Informatics.Biological psychiatry · 2025Review
- VO: The Vaccine Ontology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Standardizing Survey Data Collection to Enhance Reproducibility: Development and Comparative Evaluation of the ReproSchema Ecosystem.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite progress in the development of standards for describing and exchanging scientific information, the lack of easy-to-use standards for mapping between different representations of the same or similar objects in different databases poses a major impediment to data integration and interoperability. Mappings often lack the metadata needed to be correctly interpreted and applied. For example, are two terms equivalent or merely related? Are they narrow or broad matches? Or are they associated in some other way? Such relationships between the mapped terms are often not documented, which leads to incorrect assumptions and makes them hard to use in scenarios that require a high degree of precision (such as diagnostics or risk prediction). Furthermore, the lack of descriptions of how mappings were done makes it hard to combine and reconcile mappings, particularly curated and automated ones. We have developed the Simple Standard for Sharing Ontological Mappings (SSSOM) which addresses these problems by: (i) Introducing a machine-readable and extensible vocabulary to describe metadata that makes imprecision, inaccuracy and incompleteness in mappings explicit. (ii) Defining an easy-to-use simple table-based format that can be integrated into existing data science pipelines without the need to parse or query ontologies, and that integrates seamlessly with Linked Data principles. (iii) Implementing open and community-driven collaborative workflows that are designed to evolve the standard continuously to address changing requirements and mapping practices. (iv) Providing reference tools and software libraries for working with the standard. In this paper, we present the SSSOM standard, describe several use cases in detail and survey some of the existing work on standardizing the exchange of mappings, with the goal of making mappings Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR). The SSSOM specification can be found at http://w3id.org/sssom/spec. Database URL: http://w3id.org/sssom/spec.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.