Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35616099›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2022

Translational drug-interaction corpus.

Shijun Zhang, Hengyi Wu, Lei Wang, Gongbo Zhang, Luis M Rocha, Hagit Shatkay, Lang Li

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Drug-drug interaction identification using large language models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shijun ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4780-8416
Hengyi WuGenentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Lei WangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Gongbo ZhangDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, 101 Smith Hall, 18 Amstel Ave, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Luis M RochaSchool of Informatics & Computing, Indiana University, 919 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9402-887X
Hagit ShatkayDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, 101 Smith Hall, 18 Amstel Ave, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Lang LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of Delaware · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

The Indiana University-Ohio State University Maternal and Pediatric Precision in Therapeutics Data, Model, Knowledge, and Research Coordination Center (IU-OSU MPRINT DMKRCC)P30HD106451 · NICHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Lang Li, Sara K Quinney · 2021 to 2026
$24.1M
Evidence-based Drug-Interaction Discovery: In-Vivo, In-Vitro and ClinicalR01LM011945 · NLM · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LI, LANG, ROCHA, LUIS M · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
An informatics bridge over the valley of death for cancer Phase I trials of drug-combination therapiesU01CA248240 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, LANG · 2021 to 2023
$1.1M
NIH HHS R01LM011945NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that have a translational impact among in vitro pharmacokinetics (PK), in vivo PK and clinical outcomes depends largely on the quality of the annotated corpus available for text mining. We have developed a new DDI corpus based on an annotation scheme that builds upon and extends previous ones, where an abstract is fragmented and each fragment is then annotated along eight dimensions, namely, focus, polarity, certainty, evidence, directionality, study type, interaction type and mechanism. The guideline for defining these dimensions has undergone refinement during the annotation process. Our DDI corpus comprises 900 positive DDI abstracts and 750 that are not directly relevant to DDI. The abstracts in corpus are separated into eight categories of DDI or non-DDI evidence: DDI with pharmacokinetic (PK) mechanism, in vivo DDI PK, DDI clinical, drug-nutrition interaction, single drug, not drug related, in vitro pharmacodynamic (PD) and case report. Seven annotators, three annotators with drug-interaction research experience and four annotators with less drug-interaction research experience independently annotated the DDI corpus, where two researchers independently annotated each abstract. After two rounds of annotations with additional training in between, agreement improved from (0.79, 0.96, 0.86, 0.70, 0.91, 0.65, 0.78, 0.90) to (0.93, 0.99, 0.96, 0.94, 0.95, 0.93, 0.96, 0.97) for focus, certainty, evidence, study type, interaction type, mechanisms, polarity and direction, respectively. The novice-level annotators improved from 0.83 to 0.96, while the expert-level annotators stayed in high performance with some improvement, from 0.90 to 0.96. In summary, we achieved 96% agreement among each pair of annotators with regard to the eight dimensions. The annotated corpus is now available to the community for inclusion in their text-mining pipelines. Database URL https://github.com/zha204/DDI-Corpus-Database/tree/master/DDI%20corpus.

Indexed as

Data MiningDatabases, FactualDrug InteractionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID35616099
PMCPMC9216474
OpenAlexW4282942231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.