Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35616085›Full record

ReviewChemical Society reviews2022

Repurposing of F-gases: challenges and opportunities in fluorine chemistry.

Daniel J Sheldon, Mark R Crimmin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical Society reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. FluoBase: a fluorinated agents database.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Activation and Catalytic Degradation of SFJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Defluorination of HFCs by a magnesium reagent.Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel J SheldonDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London, 82 Wood Lane, Shepherds Bush, London, W12 0BZ, UK. m.crimmin@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2059-776X
Mark R CrimminDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London, 82 Wood Lane, Shepherds Bush, London, W12 0BZ, UK. m.crimmin@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9339-9182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorinated gases (F-gases) are routinely employed as refrigerants, blowing agents, and electrical insulators. These volatile compounds are potent greenhouse gases and consequently their release to the environment creates a significant contribution to global warming. This review article seeks to summarise: (i) the current applications of F-gases, (ii) the environmental issues caused by F-gases, (iii) current methods of destruction of F-gases and (iv) recent work in the field towards the chemical repurposing of F-gases. There is a great opportunity to tackle the environmental and sustainability issues created by F-gases by developing reactions that repurpose these molecules.

Indexed as

FluorineGasesGlobal WarmingFluorineGases

Identifiers

PMID35616085
PMCPMC9207706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.