Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35616046›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2022

Quality of life and response to treatment in cats with hypersomatotropism: the owners' point of view.

Andrea Corsini, Stijn Jm Niessen, Diego D Miceli, Sarah Caney, Florian K Zeugswetter, Nadja S Sieber-Ruckstuhl, Carolina Arenas, Linda M Fleeman, Rodolfo O Leal, Martina Battellino and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Feline Comorbidities: Hypersomatotropism-induced diabetes in cats.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Andrea CorsiniDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1673-8715
Stijn Jm NiessenRoyal Veterinary College, London, UK.
Diego D MiceliFaculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-2271-2741
Sarah CaneyVet Professionals, Midlothian Innovation Centre, Roslin, UK.
Florian K ZeugswetterClinical Department for Small Animals and Horses, Veterinarmedizinische Universitat Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Nadja S Sieber-RuckstuhlClinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carolina ArenasAniCura Hospital Veterinario Valencia Sur, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5071-7689
Linda M FleemanAnimal Diabetes Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
Rodolfo O LealCIISA - Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2463-4062
Martina BattellinoDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
Federico FracassiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3121-2199
University of Bologna · ITConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARDiabetes Australia · AUMenescalia Centro Veterinario · ESRoyal Veterinary College · GBUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Parma · ITUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to collect clinical information from owners of cats with hypersomatotropism (HS) distributed worldwide, assessing the impact of HS and its treatments on cats' quality of life (QoL) and survival time.

methodsA survey focused on clinical presentation, diagnostic procedures, treatments, cats' QoL and disease progression was distributed worldwide to owners of cats with HS. The owner's perception of the cats' QoL before and after or during treatment was defined using a score ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). Improvement following treatment (IFT) was quantified using a score ranging from 1 (absent) to 5 (obvious). Different treatment groups, including at least five cases, were compared.

resultsA total of 127 cats were included from at least 11 different countries. Among these, 120 (95%) were diabetic and 7 (5%) were not. Out of 120 diabetic cats, 55 (46%) were treated with insulin as a single treatment (INS). Other treatments were not mentioned to owners in 35/120 (29%) cases. The median QoL score at diagnosis was 2 (range 1-5) and improved after treatment in all groups. Cabergoline (4; range 1-5), radiotherapy (4; range 2-5) and hypophysectomy (5; range 4-5) showed better median IFT scores compared with INS (3; range 1-5) ( CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Not all cats with HS will have diabetes mellitus. Causal treatments seem associated with the greatest improvements in perceived cats' QoL and survival; such treatments should therefore be discussed with owners. Cabergoline could be an effective alternative management option.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDiabetes MellitusAcromegalyAnimalsCabergolineCatsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCabergolineAcromegalycabergolinediabetes mellitushypophysectomyinsulinradiation therapysurvival time

Identifiers

PMID35616046
PMCPMC10812257
OpenAlexW4281564215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.