Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35615887›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2022

Development of a live coding method to assess infant/toddler food acceptance.

Kameron J Moding, Anabelle Bonvecchio Arenas, Cloe Rawlinson, Harriet Okronipa, Selene Pacheco-Miranda, Rebecca Boenig, Abigail E Flesher, Susan L Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kameron J ModingDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2680-8257
Anabelle Bonvecchio ArenasCenter for Research in Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-0818
Cloe RawlinsonCenter for Research in Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Harriet OkronipaDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Global Nutrition, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Selene Pacheco-MirandaCenter for Research in Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Rebecca BoenigDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Nutrition, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Abigail E FlesherDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Nutrition, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Susan L JohnsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Nutrition, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USOklahoma State University · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Validated measures predicting infant consumption of nutrient supplements or fortified foods are essential for the success of nutritional interventions to improve undernutrition. Behavioural coding of food acceptance is one promising approach, though the required time and resources are limiting. The overarching goal of the present study was to adapt a video coding (VC) protocol for use as a live coding (LC) method to assess infant food acceptance in naturalistic settings. Infants (n = 59; ages 7-24 months) were fed a small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement (SQ-LNS) mixed with a familiar food by caregivers in the State of Morelos, Mexico. Trained coders used a VC scheme to rate infant acceptance of each spoon offer using a 4-point scale. The VC scheme was subsequently adapted for use as an LC method to be used in participant homes and a video live coding (VLC) method to monitor reliability. Reliability and validity of the LC method were tested in a subsample of dyads (n = 20). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated that the inter-rater reliability between coders using the LC method was moderate or good when compared to VC methods (ICCs = 0.75 and 0.87). Live coded acceptance scores were also moderately associated with consumption of the SQ-LNS (ρ = 0.50, p = 0.03). The LC scheme demonstrated initial reliability and validity as an assessment of infant food acceptance. Since VC is both resource and time-intensive, the LC scheme may be useful for assessing infant food acceptance in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Infant FoodInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild, PreschoolDietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedHumansInfantReproducibility of Resultscomplementary feedinginfant and child nutritionundernutrition

Identifiers

PMID35615887
PMCPMC9218310
OpenAlexW4281563384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.