ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2022
The Use of Clinical Scores in the Management of Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura in Children.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome and response to different management regimens in pediatric patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).Annals of hematology · 2025Observational
- Experience with Pediatric Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia over 30 Years in the Era before Eltrombopag.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the majority of children with recently diagnosed ITP have a benign, self-limiting condition, most often with a spontaneously recovery, 40% of children with ITP progress toward persistent ITP and 10-20% goes toward chronicity. Several clinical scores have been developed with the aim to perform a better monitoring outcome or to differentiate transient vs. persistent ITP (e.g., Donato score). Our paper aims to describe and to compare the most important scores used in the management of ITP in children: bleeding severity scores and chronicity prediction scores. These scores include a combination of different already known risk factors: age, gender, presence of a previous infections or vaccination, bleeding grade, type of onset, platelet count at diagnosis. The real utility of these scores has been a matter of debate and no consensus has been reached so far as to their necessity to be implemented as compulsory tool in the care of children with ITP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.