ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022
Development and Validation of a Clinical-Based Signature to Predict the 90-Day Functional Outcome for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of fever on the outcome non-anoxic acute brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Machine learning prediction of motor function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Mediation Effects of Hematoma Evacuation Efficacy in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Surgery.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Dynamic Prognostic Prediction in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a clinical-radiomics nomogram for predicting 180-day functional outcomes in patients with spontaneous thalamic hemorrhage.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Clinical, radiological, and radiomics feature-based explainable machine learning models for prediction of neurological deterioration and 90-day outcomes in mild intracerebral hemorrhage.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of 6-month functional recovery in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage: insights from XGBoost and SHAP analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- CT-based deep learning model for predicting hospital discharge outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.European radiology · 2024Article
- Non-Contrasted CT Radiomics for SAH Prognosis Prediction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a novel clinical prediction model to predict the 90-day functional outcome of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Retrospective Evaluation of Hematological and Clinical Factors Associated with 30-Day Mortality in 170 Patients Diagnosed with Intracerebral Hematoma in a Single Center in Turkey.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to develop and validate an objective and easy-to-use model for identifying patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who have a poor 90-day prognosis. This three-center retrospective study included a large cohort of 1,122 patients with ICH who presented within 6 h of symptom onset [training cohort,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.