Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35615415›Full record

ReviewERJ open research2022

ERS International Congress 2021: highlights from the Allied Respiratory Professionals assembly.

Lucy Robertson, Filipa Machado, Sebastian Rutkowski, Liliana Silva, Sabina Miranda, Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard, Thomas Janssens, Karl P Sylvester, Chris Burtin, Andreja Šajnić and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in ERJ open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Lucy RobertsonRespiratory Physiology, Royal Papworth Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts, Cambridge, UK.
Filipa MachadoRespiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory (Lab3R), School of Health Sciences (ESSUA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Sebastian RutkowskiDept of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.
Liliana SilvaMatosinhos Local Health Unit, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0055-8261
Sabina MirandaPneumology Dept, HUNSC Hospital, Tenerife, Spain.
Ingeborg Farver-VestergaardDept of Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Thomas JanssensHealth Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3140-9952
Karl P SylvesterRespiratory Physiology, Royal Papworth and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts, Cambridge, UK.
Chris BurtinREVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, BIOMED - Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Andreja ŠajnićDept for Respiratory Diseases Jordanovac, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-5221
Joana CruzCenter for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechCare), School of Health Sciences (ESSLei), Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4911-4469
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCentre for Health Technology and Services Research · PTHasselt University · BEHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria · ESInstituto Politécnico de Leiria · PTKU Leuven · BEOpole University of Technology · PLPapworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Aveiro · PTVejle Sygehus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of some of the most memorable sessions that were (co)organised by the Allied Respiratory Professionals Assembly during the 2021 European Respiratory Society International Congress, which was held online for the second consecutive year due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Early Career Members from Assembly 9 summarised the content of the sessions (three oral communication sessions, two symposia and one Expert View) with the support of the chairs from the four Assembly groups: Respiratory Function Technologists and Scientists (Group 9.01); Physiotherapists (Group 9.02); Nurses (Group 9.03); and Psychologists and Behavioural Scientists (Group 9.04). The sessions covered the following topics: impact of COVID-19 on lung function and healthcare services, and the importance of quality assurance and technology in lung function assessment; diagnosis and management of sarcopenia in patients with chronic respiratory disease; maintenance of the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation; solutions outside the hospital for the management of patients with COVID-19 in need of health care; the nursing perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic; and psychological and behavioural issues in respiratory care. This highlights article provides valuable insight into the latest scientific data and emerging areas affecting clinical practice of allied respiratory professionals.

Identifiers

PMID35615415
PMCPMC9125039
OpenAlexW4206250177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.