ArticleThe application of clinical genetics2022
Prominent Mutation of Intron 22 Inversion in Sporadic Hemophilia: Is It Worth the Antenatal Screening?
Article in The application of clinical genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multicenter Study of Diagnostic Tool for Patients with Hemophilia: From Bedside to Comprehensive Investigations.The application of clinical genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adequate replacement for patients with hemophilia is costly, especially in countries with limited resources. Objective: Factor VIII gene mutations among Thai patients with hemophilia A were analyzed for the most common mutation. The cost-effectiveness of finding one female without family history of hemophilia possessing the most common factor VIII mutation was compared with the cost of treating one patient with hemophilia. Methods: In all, 109 unrelated patients with hemophilia A, defined as sporadic cases (n=58) and hereditary cases (n=51), were enrolled for genotypic analysis. Results: Intron 22 inversion was prominently found in 34 sporadic (58.6%) and 27 hereditary (51.9%) cases. The screening for intron 22 inversion among females without family history of hemophilia at antenatal care has been optionally suggested. A female with a positive result will undergo further prenatal diagnosis of hemophilia in her male offspring. On the contrary, a female with a negative test result remains at risk to have a hemophiliac son caused by other factor VIII gene mutations not included in the screening but the risk is not as high as intron 22 inversion. Although the screening of factor VIII mutation among females without family history of hemophilia is against the current practice, it has been initiated due to the inadequate treatment provided to patients with hemophilia in countries with limited resources. The study calculated approximately one female with intron 22 inversion would exist among 17,064 females without family history of hemophilia. The cost of screening (194,870 USD) was much less than that of treating one patient with hemophilia from birth to 40 years of age by the current regimen (378,000 USD). Conclusion: Implementing antenatal screening of intron 22 inversion among females without family history of hemophilia is optionally suggested, especially in economically less-developed countries with inadequate treatment service for patients with hemophilia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.