Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35615324›Full record

ReviewMediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases2022

De Novo and Therapy-Related Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Analogies and Differences.

Giuseppe Leone, Emiliano Fabiani, Maria Teresa Voso

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms: Predisposition and Clonal Evolution.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2023
    Review
  7. TP53-Mutated Myelodysplasia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2023
    Review
  8. Bone Marrow Microenvironment Involvement in t-MN: Focus on Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2023
    Review
  9. Therapy-related Myeloid Neoplasms: Considerations for Patients' Clinical Evaluation.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe LeoneUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Emiliano FabianiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Maria Teresa VosoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our review has been to give an appropriate idea of analogies and differences between primitive MDS (p-MDS) and t-MDS throughout an accurate reviewing of English peer-reviewed literature focusing on clinical, cytogenetic, epigenetic, and somatic mutation features of these two groups of diseases. Therapy-related MDS (t-MDS) are classified by WHO together with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) in the same group, named therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. However, in clinical practice, the diagnosis of t-MDS is made with the same criteria as for primitive MDS (p-MDS), and the only difference is a previous non-myeloid neoplasm. The prognosis and the consequent therapy can be established following the same criteria as for p-MDS, and the therapy is generally decided using the same criteria. We stress the possible difference in cytogenetics, mutations, and epigenetics to distinguish the two forms. Actually, there is no marker specific for t-MDS either in cytogenetics, epigenetics, or mutations; however, some alterations are also frequent in t-MDS and, in general, they induce a poorer prognosis. So, the high-risk forms in t-MDS are prevalent. The present literature data suggest classifying the t-MDS as a subgroup of MDS and introducing some parameters to evaluate the probability of previous therapy in inducing MDS. An important issue remains the patient's fitness, which strongly influences the outcome.

Indexed as

CytogeneticsMutationsPrimitive MDSTherapy-related MDS

Identifiers

PMID35615324
PMCPMC9083943
OpenAlexW4285743331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.