ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Navigated Intraoperative 3D Ultrasound in Glioblastoma Surgery: Analysis of Imaging Features and Impact on Extent of Resection.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraoperative Ultrasound in Brain and Spine Surgery: Current Applications, Translational Value and Future Perspectives.NeuroSci · 2025Review
- 2D Intraoperative Ultrasound in Brain Metastasis Resection: A Matched Cohort Analysis from a Single-Center Experience.Cancers · 2025Article
- Stereotactically Guided Microsurgical Approach for Deep-Seated Eloquently Located Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Improving glioma resection with 2D-intraoperative ultrasound: Observational results and systematic literature correlation.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Challenges with segmenting intraoperative ultrasound for brain tumours.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Enabling Navigation and Augmented Reality in the Sitting Position in Posterior Fossa Surgery Using Intraoperative Ultrasound.Cancers · 2024Article
- Radiological and Not Clinical Variables Guide the Surgical Plan in Patients with Glioblastoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- The Feasibility and Accuracy of Holographic Navigation with Laser Crosshair Simulator Registration on a Mixed-Reality Display.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Value of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Brain Surgery.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Enhancing the Reliability of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Pediatric Space-Occupying Brain Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Augmented reality for intracranial meningioma resection: a mini-review.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Evaluation of a Navigated 3D Ultrasound Integration for Brain Tumor Surgery: First Results of an Ongoing Prospective Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuronavigation is routinely used in glioblastoma surgery, but its accuracy decreases during the operative procedure due to brain shift, which can be addressed utilizing intraoperative imaging. Intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) is widely available, offers excellent live imaging, and can be fully integrated into modern navigational systems. Here, we analyze the imaging features of navigated i3D US and its impact on the extent of resection (EOR) in glioblastoma surgery. Methods: Datasets of 31 glioblastoma resection procedures were evaluated. Patient registration was established using intraoperative computed tomography (iCT). Pre-operative MRI (pre-MRI) and pre-resectional ultrasound (pre-US) datasets were compared regarding segmented tumor volume, spatial overlap (Dice coefficient), the Euclidean distance of the geometric center of gravity (CoG), and the Hausdorff distance. Post-resectional ultrasound (post-US) and post-operative MRI (post-MRI) tumor volumes were analyzed and categorized into subtotal resection (STR) or gross total resection (GTR) cases. Results: The mean patient age was 59.3 ± 11.9 years. There was no significant difference in pre-resectional segmented tumor volumes (pre-MRI: 24.2 ± 22.3 cm Conclusion: Navigated i3D US is reliably adjunct in a multimodal navigational setup for glioblastoma resection. Tumor segmentations revealed similar results in i3D US and MRI, demonstrating the capability of i3D US to delineate tumor boundaries. Additionally, i3D US has a positive influence on the EOR, allows live imaging, and depicts brain shift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.