ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
A Motor Imagery Signals Classification Method
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LPGGNet: Learning from Local-Partition-Global Graph Representations for Motor Imagery EEG Recognition.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Stochasticity as a solution for overfitting-A new model and comparative study on non-invasive EEG prospects.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI) based on motor imagery (MI) can help patients with limb movement disorders in their normal life. In order to develop an efficient BCI system, it is necessary to decode high-accuracy motion intention by electroencephalogram (EEG) with low signal-to-noise ratio. In this article, a MI classification approach is proposed, combining the difference in EEG signals between the left and right hemispheric electrodes with a dual convolutional neural network (dual-CNN), which effectively improved the decoding performance of BCI. The positive and inverse problems of EEG were solved by the boundary element method (BEM) and weighted minimum norm estimation (WMNE), and then the scalp signals were mapped to the cortex layer. We created nine pairs of new electrodes on the cortex as the region of interest. The time series of the nine electrodes on the left and right hemispheric are respectively used as the input of the dual-CNN model to classify four MI tasks. The results show that this method has good results in both group-level subjects and individual subjects. On the Physionet database, the averaged accuracy on group-level can reach 96.36%, while the accuracies of four MI tasks reach 98.54, 95.02, 93.66, and 96.19%, respectively. As for the individual subject, the highest accuracy is 98.88%, and its four MI accuracies are 99.62, 99.68, 98.47, and 97.73%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.