ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022
The Face Inversion Effect in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experience Alone Can Generate Human Face Specialization: Evidence From Deep Learning Models.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026Article
- Using deep neural networks to disentangle visual and semantic information in human perception and memory.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- Understanding of facial features in face perception: insights from deep convolutional neural networks.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Deep learning models challenge the prevailing assumption that face-like effects for objects of expertise support domain-general mechanisms.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The face inversion effect (FIE) is a behavioral marker of face-specific processing that the recognition of inverted faces is disproportionately disrupted than that of inverted non-face objects. One hypothesis is that while upright faces are represented by face-specific mechanism, inverted faces are processed as objects. However, evidence from neuroimaging studies is inconclusive, possibly because the face system, such as the fusiform face area, is interacted with the object system, and therefore the observation from the face system may indirectly reflect influences from the object system. Here we examined the FIE in an artificial face system, visual geometry group network-face (VGG-Face), a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) specialized for identifying faces. In line with neuroimaging studies on humans, a stronger FIE was found in VGG-Face than that in DCNN pretrained for processing objects. Critically, further classification error analysis revealed that in VGG-Face, inverted faces were miscategorized as objects behaviorally, and the analysis on internal representations revealed that VGG-Face represented inverted faces in a similar fashion as objects. In short, our study supported the hypothesis that inverted faces are represented as objects in a pure face system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.