Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35615023›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

Artificial intelligence predictive system of individual survival rate for lung adenocarcinoma.

Tingshan He, Jing Li, Peng Wang, Zhiqiao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tingshan HeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shunde, Guangdong, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shunde, Guangdong, China.
Peng WangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shunde, Guangdong, China.
Zhiqiao ZhangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shunde, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The current research aimed to develop an artificial intelligence predictive system for individual survival rate of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods: Independent risk variables were identified by multivariate Cox regression. Artificial intelligence predictive system was constructed using three different data mining algorithms. Results: Stage, PM, chemotherapy, PN, age, PT, sex, and radiation_surgery were determined as risk factors for LUAD patients. For 12-month survival rate in model cohort, concordance indexes of RFS, MTLR, and Cox models were 0.852, 0.821, and 0.835, respectively. For 36-month survival rate in model cohort, concordance indexes of RFS, MTLR, and Cox models were 0.901, 0.864, and 0.862, respectively. For 60-month survival rate in model cohort, concordance indexes of RFS, MTLR, and Cox models were 0.899, 0.874, and 0.866, respectively. The concordance indexes in validation dataset were similar to those in model dataset. Conclusions: The current study designed an individualized survival predictive system, which could provide individual survival curves using three different artificial intelligence algorithms. This artificial intelligence predictive system could directly convey treatment benefits by comparing individual mortality risk curves under different treatments. This artificial intelligence predictive tool is available at https://zhangzhiqiao11.shinyapps.io/Artificial_Intelligence_Survival_Prediction_System_AI_E1001/.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceLung adenocarcinomaOverall survivalPrognostic model

Identifiers

PMID35615023
PMCPMC9123088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.