Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614894›Full record

ArticleVisceral medicine2022

Incomplete Cytoreduction of Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases: Survival Outcomes by a Cytoreduction Score.

Paul H Sugarbaker, David Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visceral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul H SugarbakerWashington Cancer Institute, Program in Peritoneal Surface Malignancy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
David ChangWestat, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The surgical management of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer has been a topic of controversial discussion for many decades. Peritonectomy and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy added options for surgical treatment of this condition beyond palliative surgery. The most favorable outcomes are recorded when peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer can be resected to no visible evidence of disease. Methods: To determine if any benefit from surgical treatment of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases can occur from incomplete resection of peritoneal metastases, we studied patients by the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score. The CC-3 indicated a palliative resection, CC-2 gross residual disease, and CC-1 almost complete cytoreduction but visible residual disease. The impact of clinical-, pathologic-, and treatment-related variables on the survival of the three groups was compared. Results: Eighty-five patients with long-term follow-up were available for study. The median age was 53 years (range 18-82). There were 60 males (70.6%). Symptomatic patients, those with bowel obstruction, and patients with positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes had significantly reduced survival. The median survival of the CC-3, CC-2, and CC-1 groups were significantly different ( Conclusions: If a near complete cytoreduction combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy can be performed, short-term survival benefit could be observed.

Indexed as

Completeness of cytoreductionCytoreductive surgeryDebulkingElectrosurgeryHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyPalliative surgeryPeritoneal cancer indexPeritonectomyTumor cell entrapmentVisceral resections

Identifiers

PMID35614894
PMCPMC9082140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.