ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2022
Clinico-radiological features of cerebral proliferative angiopathy: A large case series from India.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral proliferative angiopathy in pediatric patients: case-based review with an illustrative case.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Rare vascular brain lesions: a case report of cerebral proliferative angiopathy management.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Encephaloduroarteriomyosynangiosis with the middle meningeal artery for proliferative cerebral angiopathy treatment: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Recurrent Intraventricular Haemorrhage in Cerebral Proliferative Angiopathy - A Case Report and Review of the Literature.The Neurohospitalist · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBased on angiographic features, a rare subgroup, different from classical brain AVMs, called cerebral proliferative angiopathy (CPA) was suggested by Lasjaunias et al. in 1989. There are only few reports of CPA described from Asia. Liu et al. has described 5 cases of CPA from China. The objective of study was to evaluate the clinico-radiological features of patients with CPA in our cohort and to find out the differences between our study and the study by Lasjaunias and Liu et al.
methodsWe retrospectively analysed cases of CPA from March 2012 to April 2020. All radiological images of the patients with AVMs were studied and findings suggestive of CPA were identified. We found 10 patients with CPA out of 272 cases of AVM (10/272) and described the various demographic and clinico-radiological features.
resultsThe age of the patients with CPA in our series varied from 14 to 53 years and the mean age was 28.6 years. There was male preponderance (60%) with male to female ratio of 3:2. The most common presentation was seizure (70%). Intracranial haemorrhage was present in five patients. One patient had cerebral infarction.
conclusionsThere were substantial differences in clinico-radiological profile of patients with CPA in our cohort as compared to the study by Lasjaunias et al. and Liu et al. in form of male dominance, higher rate of ICH and seizure. In our knowledge, this is the second largest series of CPA worldwide and the first largest series in Asia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.