ArticleRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia2022
[Real-world efficacy of switching to bictegravir/ emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in pretreated patients with triple therapy containing rilpivirine].
Article in Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the efficacy and tolerability of the strategy to change from rilpivirine (RPV) based regimens to bictegravir / emtricitabine / tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF).
methodsSingle-center, observational and retrospective study. Patients who made the change to B/F/TAF before February 2020 were selected, analyzing the results after 24 and 48 weeks. The percentage that remained with an undetectable viral load was determined, as well as the changes in CD4 + lymphocytes, metabolic parameters and renal function.
resultsA total of 42 patients were included. Thirty-two of the 35 patients (91.4%) who completed the 48 weeks of follow-up had an undetectable viral load. The CD4 + lymphocyte count remained stable at 24 and 48 weeks. The response to B/F/TAF was not influenced by the two analogs previously received.
conclusionsSwitching from triple therapy with RPV to B/F/TAF is a safe and effective strategy in real life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.