Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614507›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Effects of developing scenario learning in a fundamental nursing course: a pilot study.

Kyoung-Hwa Baek, Jeong-Hwa Cho, Jongmin Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyoung-Hwa BaekDepartment of Nursing, Gyeongbuk College of Health, Gimcheon, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Hwa ChoDepartment of Nursing, Daejeon Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jongmin ParkCollege of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Republic of Korea. jmpark@pusan.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of developing scenario learning (DSL) on team efficacy, systems thinking, and proactivity in problem-solving in a fundamental nursing course.

methodsA total of 53 second-year nursing students were enrolled in the study; the DSL nursing education program was implemented for 15 weeks from March 4 to June 17, 2021. Data on team efficacy, systems thinking, and proactivity in problem-solving were measured before and after the DSL-based nursing education program. The collected data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0.

resultsThe results demonstrated that nursing students' team efficacy (t = - 8.228, p < .001, Cohen's d = 1.079), systems thinking (t = - 9.757, p < .001, Cohen's d = .731), and proactivity in problem-solving (t = - 8.635, p < .001, Cohen's d = .992) significantly increased after the program.

conclusionsThe findings of this study can contribute to the development of nursing competency in nursing students without experience in nursing practicum. The authors recommend incorporating DSL in the nursing curriculum to promote early adaptation in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Education, NursingEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateStudents, NursingCurriculumHumansLearningPilot ProjectsProblem-Based LearningDeveloping scenario LearningNursing studentProactivity in problem-solvingSystems thinkingTeam efficacy

Identifiers

PMID35614507
PMCPMC9134697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.