Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614504›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2022

Fast machine learning annotation in the medical domain: a semi-automated video annotation tool for gastroenterologists.

Adrian Krenzer, Kevin Makowski, Amar Hekalo, Daniel Fitting, Joel Troya, Wolfram G Zoller, Alexander Hann, Frank Puppe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Annotation Tools in Gastrointestinal Polyp Annotation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adrian KrenzerDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Systems, Sanderring 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. adrian.krenzer@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1593-3300
Kevin MakowskiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Systems, Sanderring 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Amar HekaloDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Systems, Sanderring 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Daniel FittingInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Joel TroyaInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Wolfram G ZollerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Katharinenhospital, Kriegsbergstrasse 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Alexander HannInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Frank PuppeDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Systems, Sanderring 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning, especially deep learning, is becoming more and more relevant in research and development in the medical domain. For all the supervised deep learning applications, data is the most critical factor in securing successful implementation and sustaining the progress of the machine learning model. Especially gastroenterological data, which often involves endoscopic videos, are cumbersome to annotate. Domain experts are needed to interpret and annotate the videos. To support those domain experts, we generated a framework. With this framework, instead of annotating every frame in the video sequence, experts are just performing key annotations at the beginning and the end of sequences with pathologies, e.g., visible polyps. Subsequently, non-expert annotators supported by machine learning add the missing annotations for the frames in-between.

methodsIn our framework, an expert reviews the video and annotates a few video frames to verify the object's annotations for the non-expert. In a second step, a non-expert has visual confirmation of the given object and can annotate all following and preceding frames with AI assistance. After the expert has finished, relevant frames will be selected and passed on to an AI model. This information allows the AI model to detect and mark the desired object on all following and preceding frames with an annotation. Therefore, the non-expert can adjust and modify the AI predictions and export the results, which can then be used to train the AI model.

resultsUsing this framework, we were able to reduce workload of domain experts on average by a factor of 20 on our data. This is primarily due to the structure of the framework, which is designed to minimize the workload of the domain expert. Pairing this framework with a state-of-the-art semi-automated AI model enhances the annotation speed further. Through a prospective study with 10 participants, we show that semi-automated annotation using our tool doubles the annotation speed of non-expert annotators compared to a well-known state-of-the-art annotation tool.

conclusionIn summary, we introduce a framework for fast expert annotation for gastroenterologists, which reduces the workload of the domain expert considerably while maintaining a very high annotation quality. The framework incorporates a semi-automated annotation system utilizing trained object detection models. The software and framework are open-source.

Indexed as

GastroenterologistsEndoscopyHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesAnnotationAutomationDeep learningEndoscopyGastroenterologyMachine learningObject detection

Identifiers

PMID35614504
PMCPMC9134702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.