ArticleMalaria journal2022
Recommendations for environmental risk assessment of gene drive applications for malaria vector control.
Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Transgenic Approaches to Mitigate Vector Transmission of Malaria by Anopheles gambiae.Cureus · 2026Review
- A male-drive female-sterile system for the self-limited control of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Is Gene Drive Research Losing Traction?The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Article
- Post-release monitoring pathway for the deployment of gene drive-modified mosquitoes for malaria control in Africa.Malaria journal · 2024Article
- Considerations for first field trials of low-threshold gene drive for malaria vector control.Malaria journal · 2024Review
- Manipulating the Destiny of Wild Populations Using CRISPR.Annual review of genetics · 2023Review
- Next-generation CRISPR gene-drive systems using Cas12a nuclease.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Bioinformatic and literature assessment of toxicity and allergenicity of a CRISPR-Cas9 engineered gene drive to control Anopheles gambiae the mosquito vector of human malaria.Malaria journal · 2023Article
- Regulatory and policy considerations for the implementation of gene drive-modified mosquitoes to prevent malaria transmission.Transgenic research · 2023Review
- TargetingViruses · 2023Review
- Conceptual risk assessment of mosquito population modification gene-drive systems to control malaria transmission: preliminary hazards list workshops.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Driving down malaria transmission with engineered gene drives.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Building on an exercise that identified potential harms from simulated investigational releases of a population suppression gene drive for malaria vector control, a series of online workshops identified nine recommendations to advance future environmental risk assessment of gene drive applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.