ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2022
Patient perspectives on depot buprenorphine treatment for opioid addiction - a qualitative interview study.
Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine in Prison: Insights From a Short-Answer Survey of People in the Criminal Justice System Commencing Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine During a Non-Randomised Clinical Trial.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Article
- How should low-threshold and primary care clinics prepare to provide long-acting injectable buprenorphine? A qualitative implementation study of patient and staff perspectives.Research square · 2026Article
- Exploring the Italian Experience with Long-Acting Buprenorphine Formulations (LAIB) for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A Series of Narrative Interviews.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Experiences of People Who Discontinue Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine Treatment Recently Released From Prison in New South Wales, Australia.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Article
- The Socioeconomic Impact of Long-Acting Injectable Buprenorphine.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Article
- Reduced need for inpatient care following introduction of long-acting injectable buprenorphine.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Long-acting injectables for the treatment of substance use disorder: a look ahead.Expert opinion on drug delivery · 2025Article
- Long acting injectable buprenorphine: Perspectives from service-users, staff and stakeholders.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2025Article
- Making long-acting treatment work: Tracing connections with extended-release buprenorphine depot through time.Drug and alcohol review · 2025Article
- Case report: Local anesthesia with lidocaine infiltration for extended-release buprenorphine therapy.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Perceptions of extended-release buprenorphine among people who received medication for opioid use disorder in jail: a qualitative study.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2024Article
- Healthcare staff's perspectives on long-acting injectable buprenorphine treatment: a qualitative interview study.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2024Article
- Reasons for not entering opioid agonist treatment: A survey among high-risk opioid users in Finland.Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2024Article
- Long-acting injectable depot buprenorphine from a harm reduction perspective in patients with ongoing substance use and multiple psychiatric comorbidities: a qualitative interview study.Harm reduction journal · 2024Article
- Patients' goals when initiating long-acting injectable buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder: findings from a longitudinal qualitative study.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2023Article
- Changes in daily dose in open-label compared to double-blind: The role of clients' expectations in injectable opioid agonist treatment.Addictive behaviors reports · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently developed buprenorphine depot injections have the potential to reduce risk for diversion and misuse, and to increase adherence with fewer visits for supervised intake. However, it is unclear how patients perceive this new form of medication. The purpose of this study was to explore patients' experiences of depot injections and their reasons for continuing, discontinuing, or declining depot injection treatment.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 32 people, 14 of whom had ongoing depot injection treatment, 11 who had discontinued depot-injections and switched to other medication and seven who had declined treatment with depot formulations. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analysed using NVivo, based on this overall stratification into three participant groups.
resultsThe main categories relate to the effects and side effects of the depot formulation, social and practical factors, psychological benefits and disadvantages, and interactions with treatment staff. Social and practical factors were of importance for choosing depot formulations, such as increased freedom and their making it easier to combine treatment with work and family life, as well as psychological advantages including "feeling normal". Initial withdrawal symptoms that resolved themselves after a number of injections were reported by most participants. Reliable information and patient-staff relationships characterized by trust helped patients to cope with these initial problems. Those who discontinued treatment often did so near the beginning of the treatment, reporting withdrawal symptoms and insufficient effects as the main reasons. Coercion and insufficient information contributed to a negative pharmaceutical atmosphere at one of the clinics, which may have adversely influenced perceptions of depot formulations and decreased willingness to accept and continue treatment.
conclusionsBuprenorphine depot injections may have social, practical, and psychological benefits compared to other formulations. However, depot injections are not perceived as an attractive option by all patients. Trust, consistent and adequate information, and awareness of the implications of the pharmaceutical atmosphere should be considered when introducing new medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.