ReviewMovement ecology2022
Recent trends in movement ecology of animals and human mobility.
Review in Movement ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polarization Holographic 4D Phenotyping Reveals Nanoplastic Induced Dysfunction in Zooplankton.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Enabling high-resolution wildlife tracking: antenna beam-based approach including novel per-position error estimations for automated radiotelemetry systems.Movement ecology · 2026Article
- The fence interface effect: how altered herbivore movement creates a soil bacterial diversity hotspot.Movement ecology · 2026Article
- Six decades of animal accelerometry: trends, applications, and future directions.Movement ecology · 2026Review
- Challenges and approaches in tracking and analyzing movement of ground-dwelling insects.Movement ecology · 2026Review
- Stuck in space but not in time: multiple-scale resource selection in a stationary prey.Movement ecology · 2026Article
- Article
- A combination of environmental and landscape variables drives movement and habitat use in two Anaxyrus toads.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Using a Low-Cost Trackball System to Assess Repeatability of Movement in Small Animals.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- A call for using rangeland-based livestock operations as model systems for studying the movement ecology of terrestrial animals.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Perceived and observed biases within scientific communities: a case study in movement ecology.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Tracking toads from dusk till dawn: linking inter- and intra-individual variation in movement behavior.Current zoology · 2025Article
- Short-range Bluetooth monitoring method for tracking, monitoring and follow-up of low-mobility wild species, Choloepus hoffmanni sp.Biology open · 2025Article
- Mapping activity of grazing cattle using commercial virtual fencing technology.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Accuracy, rationality and specialization in a generalized model of collective navigation.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Unveiling the roles of temporal periodicity, the spatial environment and behavioural modes in terrestrial animal movement.Movement ecology · 2024Article
- Study methodology impacts density-dependent dispersal observations: a systematic review.Movement ecology · 2024Article
- Ground beetle movement is deterred by habitat edges: a mark-release-recapture study on the effectiveness of border crops in an agricultural landscape.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2024Article
- Advances in biologging can identify nuanced energetic costs and gains in predators.Movement ecology · 2024Review
- Movement predictability of individual barn owls facilitates estimation of home range size and survival.Movement ecology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Movement is fundamental to life, shaping population dynamics, biodiversity patterns, and ecosystem structure. In 2008, the movement ecology framework (MEF Nathan et al. in PNAS 105(49):19052-19059, 2008) introduced an integrative theory of organismal movement-linking internal state, motion capacity, and navigation capacity to external factors-which has been recognized as a milestone in the field. Since then, the study of movement experienced a technological boom, which provided massive quantities of tracking data of both animal and human movement globally and at ever finer spatio-temporal resolutions. In this work, we provide a quantitative assessment of the state of research within the MEF, focusing on animal movement, including humans and invertebrates, and excluding movement of plants and microorganisms. Using a text mining approach, we digitally scanned the contents of [Formula: see text] papers from 2009 to 2018 available online, identified tools and methods used, and assessed linkages between all components of the MEF. Over the past decade, the publication rate has increased considerably, along with major technological changes, such as an increased use of GPS devices and accelerometers and a majority of studies now using the R software environment for statistical computing. However, animal movement research still largely focuses on the effect of environmental factors on movement, with motion and navigation continuing to receive little attention. A search of topics based on words featured in abstracts revealed a clustering of papers among marine and terrestrial realms, as well as applications and methods across taxa. We discuss the potential for technological and methodological advances in the field to lead to more integrated and interdisciplinary research and an increased exploration of key movement processes such as navigation, as well as the evolutionary, physiological, and life-history consequences of movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.