ArticleBMC surgery2022
Clinical analysis of subxiphoid single-port thoracoscopic surgery for simultaneous bilateral lung lesion resection.
Article in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the efficacy of subxiphoid and intercostal uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Simultaneous bilateral video-assisted thoracic surgery is safe and feasible for multiple primary lung cancers.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of simultaneous subxiphoid single-port thoracoscopic resection of bilateral lung lesions.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 72 patients who underwent resection of bilateral lung lesions at the Department of Thoracic Surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China between August 2020 and January 2022. Surgery-related parameters were compared between patients who underwent subxiphoid single-port thoracoscopy (subxiphoid group, 36 patients) and patients who underwent intercostal single-port thoracoscopy (intercostal group, 36 patients).
resultsCompared to the intercostal group, the subxiphoid group exhibited significantly better postoperative catheterization time (P = 0.013), postoperative thoracic drainage, postoperative visual analog scale pain scores at 24 and 48 h, and incision pain and numbness at 1 and 3 months after surgery (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, or postoperative complications between the two groups (all P > 0.05). There were no cases of perioperative mortality, conversion to thoracotomy, or serious complications in either group.
conclusionSubxiphoid single-port thoracoscopic surgery for simultaneous resection of bilateral lung lesions is safe and effective, reduces postoperative acute and chronic pain, decreases trauma, allows faster recovery, and is more consistent with the concept of minimally invasive surgery than bilateral intercostal single-port thoracoscopy. Thus, this subxiphoid single-port thoracoscopic surgery approach should be considered for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.