Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614318›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2022

Immunoglobulin gene sequence analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the 2022 update of the recommendations by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL.

Andreas Agathangelidis, Anastasia Chatzidimitriou, Thomas Chatzikonstantinou, Cristina Tresoldi, Zadie Davis, Véronique Giudicelli, Sofia Kossida, Chrysoula Belessi, Richard Rosenquist, Paolo Ghia and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Andreas AgathangelidisInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anastasia ChatzidimitriouInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Thomas ChatzikonstantinouInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4105-1253
Cristina TresoldiDivision of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7711-5621
Zadie DavisDepartment of Molecular Pathology, University Hospitals Dorset, Bournemouth, UK.
Véronique GiudicelliInternational ImMunoGeneTics Information System (IMGT), Institut de Génétique Humaine (IGH), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Sofia KossidaInternational ImMunoGeneTics Information System (IMGT), Institut de Génétique Humaine (IGH), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2482-0022
Chrysoula BelessiHematology Department, Nikea General Hospital, Pireaus, Greece.
Richard RosenquistDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Paolo GhiaDivision of Experimental Oncology, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. ghia.paolo@hsr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3750-7342
Anton W LangerakDepartment of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2078-3220
Frédéric DaviDepartment of Hematology, APHP, HôpitalPitié-Salpêtrière and Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Kostas StamatopoulosInstitute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRKarolinska Institutet · SEBournemouth University · GBCentre for Research and Technology Hellas · GRErasmus MC · NLGeneral Hospital of Nikea · GRIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITKarolinska University Hospital · SENational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSorbonne Université · FRVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The somatic hypermutation (SHM) status of the clonotypic immunoglobulin heavy variable (IGHV) gene is a critical biomarker for assessing the prognosis of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Importantly, independent studies have documented that IGHV SHM status is also a predictor of responses to therapy, including both chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and novel, targeted agents. Moreover, immunogenetic analysis in CLL has revealed that different patients may express (quasi)identical, stereotyped B cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) and are classified into subsets based on this common feature. Patients in certain stereotyped subsets display consistent biology, clinical presentation, and outcome that are distinct from other patients, even with concordant IGHV gene SHM status. All of the above highlights the relevance of immunogenetic analysis in CLL, which is considered a cornerstone for accurate risk stratification and clinical decision making. Recommendations for robust immunogenetic analysis exist thanks to dedicated efforts by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, covering all test phases, from the pre-analytical and analytical to the post-analytical, pertaining to the analysis, interpretation, and reporting of the findings. That said, these recommendations apply to Sanger sequencing, which is increasingly being superseded by next generation sequencing (NGS), further underscoring the need for an update. Here, we present an overview of the clinical utility of immunogenetics in CLL and update our analytical recommendations with the aim to assist in the refined management of patients with CLL.

Indexed as

Genes, ImmunoglobulinLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunoglobulinsReceptors, Antigen, B-CellImmunoglobulinsReceptors, Antigen, B-Cell

Identifiers

PMID35614318
PMCPMC9343247
OpenAlexW4281485894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.