Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614243›Full record

ReviewNature2022

Evolution of Earth's tectonic carbon conveyor belt.

R Dietmar Müller, Ben Mather, Adriana Dutkiewicz, Tobias Keller, Andrew Merdith, Christopher M Gonzalez, Weronika Gorczyk, Sabin Zahirovic

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Carbonate burial regimes, the Meso-Cenozoic climate, and nannoplankton expansion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The effects of bathymetry on the long-term carbon cycle and CCD.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. PeerJ · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

R Dietmar MüllerEarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. dietmar.muller@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3334-5764
Ben MatherEarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3566-1557
Adriana DutkiewiczEarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tobias KellerSchool of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6121-5377
Andrew MerdithSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7564-8149
Christopher M GonzalezCentre for Exploration Targeting, School of Earth Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Weronika GorczykCentre for Exploration Targeting, School of Earth Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6704-9808
Sabin ZahirovicEarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6751-4976
The University of Sydney · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concealed deep beneath the oceans is a carbon conveyor belt, propelled by plate tectonics. Our understanding of its modern functioning is underpinned by direct observations, but its variability through time has been poorly quantified. Here we reconstruct oceanic plate carbon reservoirs and track the fate of subducted carbon using thermodynamic modelling. In the Mesozoic era, 250 to 66 million years ago, plate tectonic processes had a pivotal role in driving climate change. Triassic-Jurassic period cooling correlates with a reduction in solid Earth outgassing, whereas Cretaceous period greenhouse conditions can be linked to a doubling in outgassing, driven by high-speed plate tectonics. The associated 'carbon subduction superflux' into the subcontinental mantle may have sparked North American diamond formation. In the Cenozoic era, continental collisions slowed seafloor spreading, reducing tectonically driven outgassing, while deep-sea carbonate sediments emerged as the Earth's largest carbon sink. Subduction and devolatilization of this reservoir beneath volcanic arcs led to a Cenozoic increase in carbon outgassing, surpassing mid-ocean ridges as the dominant source of carbon emissions 20 million years ago. An increase in solid Earth carbon emissions during Cenozoic cooling requires an increase in continental silicate weathering flux to draw down atmospheric carbon dioxide, challenging previous views and providing boundary conditions for future carbon cycle models.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideEarth, PlanetCarbonatesCarbon CycleOceans and SeasCarbonatesCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID35614243
OpenAlexW4281485441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.