Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614214›Full record

ReviewNature2022

Strongly correlated electron-photon systems.

Jacqueline Bloch, Andrea Cavalleri, Victor Galitski, Mohammad Hafezi, Angel Rubio

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantum control of Hubbard excitons.Nature materials · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Tuning Fermi liquids with polaritonic cavities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Bound polariton states in the Dicke-Ising model.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacqueline BlochCentre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies (C2N), Universite Paris Saclay - CNRS, Palaiseau, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7823-8420
Andrea CavalleriMax Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3143-0850
Victor GalitskiDepartment of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. galitski@umd.edu.
Mohammad HafeziDepartments of Physics and ECE, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1679-4880
Angel RubioMax Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-3151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important goal of modern condensed-matter physics involves the search for states of matter with emergent properties and desirable functionalities. Although the tools for material design remain relatively limited, notable advances have been recently achieved by controlling interactions at heterointerfaces, precise alignment of low-dimensional materials and the use of extreme pressures. Here we highlight a paradigm based on controlling light-matter interactions, which provides a way to manipulate and synthesize strongly correlated quantum matter. We consider the case in which both electron-electron and electron-photon interactions are strong and give rise to a variety of phenomena. Photon-mediated superconductivity, cavity fractional quantum Hall physics and optically driven topological phenomena in low dimensions are among the frontiers discussed in this Perspective, which highlights a field that we term here 'strongly correlated electron-photon science'.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.