Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614191›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Influence of restorative material translucency on the chameleon effect.

Tanaporn Vattanaseangsiri, Areeyabhorn Khawpongampai, Pornpitcha Sittipholvanichkul, Nawaporn Jittapiromsak, Sumana Posritong, Kornchanok Wayakanon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Effect of Plaque Detectors on the Color Stability of Two Types of Restorative Materials.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Smart Monochromatic Composite: A Literature Review.International journal of dentistry · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tanaporn VattanaseangsiriDepartment of Oral Biology, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Areeyabhorn KhawpongampaiDepartment of Oral Biology, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Pornpitcha SittipholvanichkulDepartment of Oral Biology, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Nawaporn JittapiromsakDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Sumana PosritongDepartment of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Kornchanok WayakanonDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand. wkornchanok@hotmail.com.
Naresuan University · THMinistry of Public Health · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blending of artificial restoration materials to the natural tooth is challenging. Beyond just color, optical properties, particularly translucency, substantially influence the final appearance. The more chameleon effect that the restorative materials exhibit, the more natural looking restorations. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of restorative material translucency on the chameleon effect. Five types of resin composite in three different shades as well as one shade of conventional glass ionomer cement were fabricated into disks. To analyze the chameleon effect, glass ceramic blocks were milled to create four wells in each block. The restorative materials were filled into the wells. The color was measured with CIE L*a*b* every 6 months. Statistical analysis was conducted using Two-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA. The material with the highest translucency was flowable resin composite. The high translucency materials exhibited an immediate chameleon effect, as did the bulk-fill resin composites, which are low translucency. Both high and low translucency materials exhibited a delayed chameleon effect for 3 years, except for the bulk fill resin composites. The translucency of the restorative materials had a 68% positive correlation with their chameleon effect. The age of the restoration is one important factor influencing the color blending.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsGlass Ionomer CementsColorMaterials TestingComposite ResinsGlass Ionomer Cements

Identifiers

PMID35614191
PMCPMC9133047
OpenAlexW4281482708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.