Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614186›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The effects of rotating magnetic field and antiseptic on in vitro pathogenic biofilm and its milieu.

Daria Ciecholewska-Juśko, Anna Żywicka, Adam Junka, Marta Woroszyło, Marcin Wardach, Grzegorz Chodaczek, Patrycja Szymczyk-Ziółkowska, Paweł Migdał, Karol Fijałkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Potential of isoquinoline-alkaloid-richFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Evaluation of Colistin Susceptibility ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Modern antiseptics against multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Assessment of Activity of Antiseptic Agents against Biofilm ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daria Ciecholewska-JuśkoDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Animal Husbandry, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Piastów 45, 70-311, Szczecin, Poland.
Anna ŻywickaDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Animal Husbandry, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Piastów 45, 70-311, Szczecin, Poland.
Adam JunkaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Wroclaw, Borowska 211a, 50-534, Wrocław, Poland. adam.junka@umed.wroc.pl.
Marta WoroszyłoDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Animal Husbandry, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Piastów 45, 70-311, Szczecin, Poland.
Marcin WardachFaculty of Electrical Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Sikorskiego 37, 70-313, Szczecin, Poland.
Grzegorz ChodaczekLaboratory of Confocal Microscopy, Łukasiewicz Research Network-PORT Polish Center for Technology Development, Stabłowicka 147, 54-066, Wrocław, Poland.
Patrycja Szymczyk-ZiółkowskaCentre for Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (CAMT/FPC), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Łukasiewicza 5, 50-371, Wrocław, Poland.
Paweł MigdałDepartment of Environment, Hygiene and Animal Welfare, Faculty of Biology and Animal Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Chełmońskiego 38C, 51-630, Wrocław, Poland.
Karol FijałkowskiDepartment of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Animal Husbandry, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Piastów 45, 70-311, Szczecin, Poland. karol.fijalkowski@zut.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of various magnetic fields for boosting the efficacy of different antimicrobial molecules or in the character of a self-reliant antimicrobial agent is considered a promising approach to eradicating bacterial biofilm-related infections. The purpose of this study was to analyze the phenomenon of increased activity of octenidine dihydrochloride-based antiseptic (OCT) against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the presence of the rotating magnetic field (RMF) of two frequencies, 5 and 50 Hz, in the in vitro model consisting of stacked agar discs, placed in increasing distance from the source of the antiseptic solution. The biofilm-forming cells' viability and morphology as well as biofilm matrix structure and composition were analyzed. Also, octenidine dihydrochloride permeability through biofilm and porous agar obstacles was determined for the RMF-exposed versus unexposed settings. The exposure to RMF or OCT apart did not lead to biofilm destruction, contrary to the setting in which these two agents were used together. The performed analyses revealed the effect of RMF not only on biofilms (weakening of cell wall/membranes, disturbed morphology of cells, altered biofilm matrix porosity, and composition) but also on its milieu (altered penetrability of octenidine dihydrochloride through biofilm/agar obstacles). Our results suggest that the combination of RMF and OCT can be particularly promising in eradicating biofilms located in such areas as wound pockets, where physical obstacles limit antiseptic activity.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAgarAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsMagnetic FieldsPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusAgarAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, Local

Identifiers

PMID35614186
PMCPMC9132948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.