Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614153›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Using machine learning to predict individual patient toxicities from cancer treatments.

Katherine Marie Cole, Mark Clemons, Sharon McGee, Mashari Alzahrani, Gail Larocque, Fiona MacDonald, Michelle Liu, Gregory R Pond, Lucy Mosquera, Lisa Vandermeer and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05222464 (Utilizing MyChart to Assess the Effectiveness of Interventions for Vasomotor Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05222464 phase4completednot on this map

Utilizing MyChart to Assess the Effectiveness of Interventions for Vasomotor Symptoms: A Feasibility Study (REaCT-Hot Flashes Pilot)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRan2022 to 2022Enrolled56ConditionsBreast CancerArmsStandard of care treatments
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine Marie ColeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Mark ClemonsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Sharon McGeeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0323-6372
Mashari AlzahraniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Gail LarocqueThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
Fiona MacDonaldThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
Michelle LiuCancer Therapeutics Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Gregory R PondDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lucy MosqueraCHEO Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
Lisa VandermeerCancer Therapeutics Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Brian HuttonClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ardelle PiperUniversity of Ottawa Health Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ricardo FernandesDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Khaled El EmamCHEO Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada. kelemam@cheo.on.ca.
University of Ottawa · CAOttawa Hospital · CAMcMaster University · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMachine learning (ML) is a powerful tool for interrogating datasets and learning relationships between multiple variables. We utilized a ML model to identify those early breast cancer (EBC) patients at highest risk of developing severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS).

methodsA gradient boosted decision model utilizing cross-sectional survey data from 360 EBC patients was created. Seventeen patient- and treatment-specific variables were considered in the model. The outcome variable was based on the Hot Flush Night Sweats (HFNS) Problem Rating Score, and individual scores were dichotomized around the median to indicate individuals with high and low problem scores. Model accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve, and conditional partial dependence plots were constructed to illustrate relationships between variables and the outcome of interest.

resultsThe model area under the ROC curve was 0.731 (SD 0.074). The most important variables in the model were as follows: the number of hot flashes per week, age, the prescription, or use of drug interventions to manage VMS, whether patients were asked about VMS in routine follow-up visits, and the presence or absence of changes to breast cancer treatments due to VMS. A threshold of 17 hot flashes per week was identified as being more predictive of severe VMS. Patients between the ages of 49 and 63 were more likely to report severe symptoms.

conclusionMachine learning is a unique tool for predicting severe VMS. The use of ML to assess other treatment-related toxicities and their management requires further study.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHot FlashesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMachine LearningMenopauseMiddle AgedSweatingArtificial intelligenceBreast cancerHot flashesMachine learningSurvivorshipVasomotor symptoms

Identifiers

PMID35614153
PMCPMC9385785
OpenAlexW4281489480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.