Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35614136›Full record

SynthesisJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2022

Growing up green: a systematic review of the influence of greenspace on youth development and health outcomes.

Nadav L Sprague, Pilar Bancalari, Wasie Karim, Shabnaz Siddiq

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of nature on the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents: meta-review.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Environmental health perceptions of urban youth from low-income communities: A qualitative photovoice study and framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  19. Effects of Vegetation Structure on Psychological Restoration in an Urban Rooftop Space.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadav L SpragueColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. nls2171@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-9962
Pilar BancalariColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Wasie KarimColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Shabnaz SiddiqColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Supplemental Training in Making Data FAIR and AI/ML ReadyT32ES007322 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Pam R Factor-Litvak, Allison Kupsco · 2000 to 2026
$12.1M
Prenatal exposure to phthalates and associations with gestational weight gain and fetal growth trajectories.F31ES034972 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SIDDIQ, SHABNAZ · 2023 to 2024
$97k
NIEHS NIH HHS F31 ES034972NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Youth growing up in places with more greenspaces have better developmental outcomes. The literature on greenspace and youth development is largely cross-sectional, thus limited in terms of measuring development and establishing causal inference. We conducted a systematic review of prospective, longitudinal studies measuring the association between greenspace exposure and youth development outcomes measured between ages two and eighteen. We searched Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Environment Complete, and included prospective cohort, quasi-experimental, and experimental studies on greenspace and youth development. Study quality was assessed using a 10-item checklist adapted from a previously published review on greenspace and health. Twenty-eight studies met criteria for review and were grouped into five thematic categories based on reported outcomes: cognitive and brain development, mental health and wellbeing, attention and behavior, allergy and respiratory, and obesity and weight. Seventy-nine percent of studies suggest an association between greenspace and improved youth development. Most studies were concentrated in wealthy, Western European countries, limiting generalizability of findings. Key opportunities for future research include: (1) improved uniformity of standards in measuring greenspace, (2) improved measures to account for large latency periods between greenspace exposure and developmental outcomes, and (3) more diverse study settings and populations.

Indexed as

ObesityParks, RecreationalAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesChild exposure/healthChildren’s healthEarly life exposureEpidemiologyHealth studiesSustainable development

Identifiers

PMID35614136
PMCPMC9482936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.